Attitude and perceptions toward miscarriage: a survey of a general population in Japan
Abstract
Miscarriage is the greatest complication of pregnancy, and 70-80% of early miscarriages are mostly due to chromosomal abnormalities in the embryo. There is no evidence that stress is a direct cause of miscarriage. Despite these findings, in a national US survey on the causes of miscarriage, many Americans mistakenly attributed miscarriage to the mental state or behavior of the women. We conducted a survey to assess public attitudes and perceptions regarding the cause and prevalence of miscarriage in Japan. We sent out a questionnaire consisting of 17 questions. The 5000 recipients consisted of men and women (1:1 ratio) aged 18-69 who resided in Aichi Prefecture. A total of 1257 recipients (25%) responded to the questionnaire and 1219 valid respondents (24%) were included in the analyses. Of these, 62% considered a genetic abnormality of the fetus as the cause of miscarriage. Participants who were female, highly educated, married and healthy gave significantly more correct responses. On the other hand, the majority wrongly assumed that a stressful event (65%) and long-standing stress (75%) to be causes of miscarriage. Participants who had no history of miscarriage as well as males answered significantly more incorrectly. Sixty-five percent of respondents thought that miscarriage occurred less than 15% of all pregnancies. Among respondents who had experienced miscarriage personally, 53 and 36% felt guilty and lonely, respectively. Many respondents blamed the woman for the miscarriage either in terms of her behavior or mental stress and considered the frequency of miscarriage to be lower than it actually is.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Misconceptions about miscarriage are widespread.
“Misconceptions about miscarriage are widespread. 1-3”
From Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
Miscarriage is often misunderstood by women, men, and healthcare providers.
“Miscarriage is often misunderstood by women, men, 1 and healthcare providers.”
From Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
Misconceptions about miscarriage can be damaging, leaving women and their partners feeling at fault and not seeking treatment and support.
“Such misconceptions can be damaging, leaving women and their partners feeling at fault and not seeking treatment and support. 1”
From Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Banno, C., Sugiura-Ogasawara, M., Ebara, T., Ide, S., Kitaori, T., Sato, T., Ando, K., & Morita, Y.
- Affiliations
- Nagoya City University (JP)
- Venue
- Journal of Human Genetics
- Published
- 2019-11-25
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-164
- ISSN
- 1434-5161 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-232X
- OpenAlex
- W2990219079
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17K11245, 18K09267)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- miscarriage, public perception, fetal chromosomal abnormalities, Japan
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude, Chromosome Aberrations, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review