Benefits of mindfulness meditation in reducing blood pressure and stress in patients with arterial hypertension
Abstract
The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the benefits of mindfulness meditation in controlling ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and the impact of the intervention on anxiety, stress and depression levels in a Mediterranean population. Twenty-four and 18 patients [n = 42; mean age 56.5 (7.7) years; similar men and women proportions] with high-normal BP or grade I hypertension were enrolled to an intervention and a control group, respectively. For 2 h/week over 8 weeks, the intervention group received mindfulness training and the control group attended health education talks. The patients attended pre-intervention, week 4, week 8 and week 20 follow-up visits. 61.9% of the patients had anxiety, 21.4% depression, 19.0% were smokers and 14.2% were diabetic (no significant differences between the 2 groups). At baseline, the intervention group had non-significant higher clinically measured BP values, whereas both groups had similar ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) values. At week 8, the intervention group had statistically significant lower ABPM scores than the control group (124/77 mmHg vs 126/80 mmHg (p < 0.05) and 108/65 mmHg vs 114/69 mmHg (p < 0.05) for 24-h and night-time systolic BP (SBP), respectively) and also had lower clinically measured SBP values (130 mmHg vs 133 mmHg; p = 0.02). At week 20 (follow-up), means were lower in the intervention group (although not statistically significant). Improvements were observed in the intervention group in terms o…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The standard deviation at end points did not significantly change compared with the baseline standard deviation of the same blood pressure variables in the other included studies.
“This was because the SD at end points did not significantly change compared with the SD at baseline of the same BP variables in the other included studies. 35,36”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 28 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Ponte Márquez, P. H., Feliu-Soler, A., Solé-Villa, M. J., Matas-Pericas, L., Filella-Agullo, D., Ruiz-Herrerias, M., Soler-Ribaudi, J., Roca-Cusachs Coll, A., & Arroyo-Díaz, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Hospital de Sant Pau (ES)
- Venue
- Journal of Human Hypertension
- Published
- 2018-11-13
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-247
- ISSN
- 0950-9240 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5527
- OpenAlex
- W2901222467
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Human Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Keywords
- mindfulness meditation, hypertension, blood pressure control, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, stress, anxiety, depression, Mediterranean populations, health education
- MeSH terms
- Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Stress, Psychological, Meditation, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review