Cited by 28Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

The association of cardiorespiratory fitness and the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

Cheng, Cheng, Zhang, Dongdong, Chen, Shuaiyin, Duan, Guangcai·2022·Journal of Human Hypertension

Abstract

Established evidence has indicated a negative correlation between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and hypertension risk. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the categorical and dose-response relationship between CRF and hypertension risk and the effects of CRF changes on hypertension risk reduction. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies. The summarized relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using the DerSimonian and Laird random effect model, and the dose-response relationship between CRF and hypertension risk was characterized using generalized least-squares regression and restricted cubic splines. Nine cohorts describing 110,638 incident hypertension events among 1,618,067 participants were included in this study. Compared with the lowest category of CRF, the RR of hypertension was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56-0.70) for the highest CRF category and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91) for the moderate category of CRF. For a 1-metabolic equivalent increment in CRF, the pooled RR of hypertension was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94) in the total population. The RR of hypertension was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.79) for participants with CRF increased compared with those whose CRF was decreased over time. In conclusion, our meta-analysis supports the widely held notion of a negative dose-dependent relationship between CRF and hypertension risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41371-021-00567-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 28

Authors
Cheng, C., Zhang, D., Chen, S., & Duan, G.
Affiliations
Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Shuaiyin
  • Duan, Guangcai
Venue
Journal of Human Hypertension
Published
2021-06-24
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
744-752
ISSN
  • 0950-9240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5527
OpenAlex
W3175927687
Cited by
28
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
cardiorespiratory fitness, hypertension risk, dose-response relationship, metabolic equivalents, hypertension incidence, cardiovascular health, physical fitness
MeSH terms
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Humans, Hypertension, Risk, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review