The association of cardiorespiratory fitness and the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
Abstract
Established evidence has indicated a negative correlation between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and hypertension risk. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the categorical and dose-response relationship between CRF and hypertension risk and the effects of CRF changes on hypertension risk reduction. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies. The summarized relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using the DerSimonian and Laird random effect model, and the dose-response relationship between CRF and hypertension risk was characterized using generalized least-squares regression and restricted cubic splines. Nine cohorts describing 110,638 incident hypertension events among 1,618,067 participants were included in this study. Compared with the lowest category of CRF, the RR of hypertension was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56-0.70) for the highest CRF category and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91) for the moderate category of CRF. For a 1-metabolic equivalent increment in CRF, the pooled RR of hypertension was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94) in the total population. The RR of hypertension was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.79) for participants with CRF increased compared with those whose CRF was decreased over time. In conclusion, our meta-analysis supports the widely held notion of a negative dose-dependent relationship between CRF and hypertension risk.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A one-MET improvement in aerobic fitness is associated with an 8% hypertension risk reduction in a dose-response relationship.
“Alternatively, a one-MET improvement in aerobic fitness is associated with an 8% hypertension risk reduction in a dose-response relationship (i.e., greater fitness, lower hypertension risk) [58].”
From The Identification and Management of High Blood Pressure Using Exercise Blood Pressure: Current Evidence and Practical Guidance (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Cheng, C., Zhang, D., Chen, S., & Duan, G.
- Affiliations
- Zhengzhou University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Shuaiyin
- Duan, Guangcai
- Venue
- Journal of Human Hypertension
- Published
- 2021-06-24
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 744-752
- ISSN
- 0950-9240 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5527
- OpenAlex
- W3175927687
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Human Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- cardiorespiratory fitness, hypertension risk, dose-response relationship, metabolic equivalents, hypertension incidence, cardiovascular health, physical fitness
- MeSH terms
- Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Humans, Hypertension, Risk, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review