Cited by 259Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesCancer-related Molecular Pathways

TP53 mutation status divides myelodysplastic syndromes with complex karyotypes into distinct prognostic subgroups

Open access
for the International Working Group for MDS Molecular Prognostic Committee, Haase, Detlef, Stevenson, Kristen E., Neuberg, Donna, Maciejewski, Jaroslaw P., Nazha, Aziz, Sekeres, Mikkael A., Ebert, Benjamin L. +43 more·2019·Leukemia

Abstract

Risk stratification is critical in the care of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Approximately 10% have a complex karyotype (CK), defined as more than two cytogenetic abnormalities, which is a highly adverse prognostic marker. However, CK-MDS can carry a wide range of chromosomal abnormalities and somatic mutations. To refine risk stratification of CK-MDS patients, we examined data from 359 CK-MDS patients shared by the International Working Group for MDS. Mutations were underrepresented with the exception of TP53 mutations, identified in 55% of patients. TP53 mutated patients had even fewer co-mutated genes but were enriched for the del(5q) chromosomal abnormality (p < 0.005), monosomal karyotype (p < 0.001), and high complexity, defined as more than 4 cytogenetic abnormalities (p < 0.001). Monosomal karyotype, high complexity, and TP53 mutation were individually associated with shorter overall survival, but monosomal status was not significant in a multivariable model. Multivariable survival modeling identified severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8.0 g/dL), NRAS mutation, SF3B1 mutation, TP53 mutation, elevated blast percentage (>10%), abnormal 3q, abnormal 9, and monosomy 7 as having the greatest survival risk. The poor risk associated with CK-MDS is driven by its association with prognostically adverse TP53 mutations and can be refined by considering clinical and karyotype features.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41375-018-0351-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TP53 mutation burden (high variant allele frequency, concurrent complex karyotype, and/or multihit state) is linked to inferior survival with median overall survival of 6-8 months.

    “The TP53 mutation burden (ie, high variant allele frequency [VAF], concurrent complex karyotype, and/or multihit state) is integrally linked to inferior survival with median OS of 6-8 months.8-10,12”

    From Eprenetapopt (APR-246) and Azacitidine in <i>TP53</i> -Mutant Myelodysplastic Syndromes (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

    In Results, under “Karyotype abnormalities and TP53 mutation are associated with OS” (page unavailable), TP53-mutated patients with complex-karyotype MDS had a median overall survival of 0.6 years (about 7 months); those with VAF >0.4 also had a median of 0.6 years, shorter than the lower-VAF group. The paper does not establish the same adverse association for a multihit state: patients with more than one TP53 mutation did not have different survival from those with one mutation (p = 0.77). Its findings are also confined to complex-karyotype MDS. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • mTP53 patients with high VAF (>20-23%), biallelic state, and/or complex karyotype have particularly poor risk.

    “Specifically, mTP53 patients with a high variant allele frequency (VAF; i.e., >20%–23%), biallelic state, and/or complex karyotype (CK) have particularly poor risk.”

    From Long‐term follow‐up and combined Phase 2 results of eprenetapopt and azacitidine in patients with <i>TP53</i> mutant MDS/AML (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results section ('Karyotype abnormalities and TP53 mutation are associated with OS'; page unavailable) reports shorter survival for TP53-mutated complex-karyotype MDS patients with VAF >40% than for those with VAF ≤40%. The paper supports adverse risk associated with TP53 mutation in this population, but it does not establish the claimed >20–23% cutoff or a prognostic effect of biallelic state; because the cohort consists of complex-karyotype patients, it does not establish CK as an additional risk factor among TP53-mutated patients relative to those without CK. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Treatment outcomes for patients with TP53 mutations are poor with available therapies.

    “Treatment outcomes for patients with TP53 mutations are poor with available therapies.8-12”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 259

Authors
for the International Working Group for MDS Molecular Prognostic Committee, Haase, D., Stevenson, K. E., Neuberg, D., Maciejewski, J. P., Nazha, A., Sekeres, M. A., Ebert, B. L., Garcia-Manero, G., Haferlach, C., Haferlach, T., Kern, W., Ogawa, S., Nagata, Y., Yoshida, K., Graubert, T. A., Walter, M. J., List, A. F., Komrokji, R. S., Padron, E., Sallman, D., Papaemmanuil, E., Campbell, P. J., Savona, M. R., Seegmiller, A., Adès, L., Fenaux, P., Shih, L.-Y., Bowen, D., Groves, M. J., Tauro, S., Fontenay, M., Kosmider, O., Bar-Natan, M., Steensma, D., Stone, R., Heuser, M., Thol, F., Cazzola, M., Malcovati, L., Karsan, A., Ganster, C., Hellström-Lindberg, E., Boultwood, J., Pellagatti, A., Santini, V., Quek, L., Vyas, P., Tüchler, H., Greenberg, P. L., & Bejar, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Munich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany) (DE)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
  • Stanford Cancer Institute (US)
  • Moores Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bejar, Rafael
Venue
Leukemia
Published
2019-01-11
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
1747-1758
ISSN
  • 0887-6924 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5551
OpenAlex
W2908744276
Cited by
259
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 19
FWCI
22.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Leukemia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Celgene
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Washington University in St. Louis
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0617-10056)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HE 5240/6‐1)
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (20125)
  • Blood Cancer UK
  • Medical Research Council (MR/R007608/1, MC_UU_00016/11, G1000729/94931, G1000729, MR/L008963/1)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19H05656, 15H05909)
  • National Cancer Institute (K12CA076917, P50CA206963, P01CA101937, P30CA008748)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K08DK091360)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
myelodysplastic syndrome, complex karyotype, TP53 mutation, risk stratification, prognostic subgroups, del(5q), monosomal karyotype, SF3B1 mutation, NRAS mutation, monosomy 7, overall survival, chromosomal abnormalities
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chromosome Aberrations, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Karyotyping, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Survival Rate, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review