The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Hot” electrons in metallic nanostructures—non-thermal carriers or heating?
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the interplay between illumination and the electron distribution in metallic nanostructures is a crucial step towards developing applications such as plasmonic photocatalysis for green fuels, nanoscale photodetection and more. Elucidating this interplay is challenging, as it requires taking into account all channels of energy flow in the electronic system. Here, we develop such a theory, which is based on a coupled Boltzmann-heat equations and requires only energy conservation and basic thermodynamics, where the electron distribution, and the electron and phonon (lattice) temperatures are determined uniquely. Applying this theory to realistic illuminated nanoparticle systems, we find that the electron and phonon temperatures are similar, thus justifying the (classical) single-temperature models. We show that while the fraction of high-energy “hot” carriers compared to thermalized carriers grows substantially with illumination intensity, it remains extremely small (on the order of 10−8). Importantly, most of the absorbed illumination power goes into heating rather than generating hot carriers, thus rendering plasmonic hot carrier generation extremely inefficient. Our formulation allows for the first time a unique quantitative comparison of theory and measurements of steady-state electron distributions in metallic nanostructures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thermal conductance of interfaces between highly dissimilar materials
Lyeo, H.-K., & Cahill, D. G. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.144301 · Cited by 576
Photochemistry on Metal Nanoparticles
Watanabe, K., Menzel, D., Nilius, N., & Freund, H.-J. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050167g · Cited by 486
Cited by
Flow and extraction of energy and charge carriers in hybrid plasmonic nanostructures
Linic, S., Chavez, S., & Elias, R. (2021) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-020-00858-4 · Cited by 363
Koya, A. N., Zhu, X., Ohannesian, N., Yanik, A. A., Alabastri, A., Proietti Zaccaria, R., Krahne, R., Shih, W.-C., & Garoli, D. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c10945 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubi, Y., & Sivan, Y.
- Venue
- Light: Science & Applications
- Published
- 2019-10-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-89
- ISSN
- 2047-7538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2893464135
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Hot” electrons in metallic nanostructures—non-thermal carriers or heating? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41377-019-0199-x
- The paper
- Dubi, Y., & Sivan, Y. (2019). “Hot” electrons in metallic nanostructures—non-thermal carriers or heating? Light: Science & Applications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-019-0199-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.