Treatment strategies for ADHD: an evidence-based guide to select optimal treatment
Abstract
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common and impairing disorder affecting children, adolescents, and adults. Several treatment strategies are available that can successfully ameliorate symptoms, ranging from pharmacological to dietary interventions. Due to the increasing range of available options, an informed selection or prioritization of treatments is becoming harder for clinicians. This review aims to provide an evidence-based appraisal of the literature on ADHD treatment, supplemented by expert opinion on plausibility. We outline proposed mechanisms of action of established pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments, and we review targets of novel treatments. The most relevant evidence supporting efficacy and safety of each treatment strategy is discussed. We review the individualized features of the patient that should guide the selection of treatments in a shared decision-making continuum. We provide guidance for optimizing initiation of treatment and follow-up of patients in clinical settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nonstimulants are considered second-line medication and are administered when stimulants are contraindicated or because of lack of response or intolerance.
“Nonstimulants are considered as second-line medication and are administered when stimulants are contraindicated or because of lack of response or intolerance [35].”
From Molecular Characterisation of the Mechanism of Action of Stimulant Drugs Lisdexamfetamine and Methylphenidate on ADHD Neurobiology: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 214 · Cited by 303
- Authors
- Caye, A., Swanson, J. M., Coghill, D., & Rohde, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Caye, Arthur
- Venue
- Molecular Psychiatry
- Published
- 2018-06-28
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 390-408
- ISSN
- 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5578
- OpenAlex
- W2810640320
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 214
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD treatment, pharmacotherapy, non-pharmacological treatment, dietary intervention, mechanism of action, treatment selection, shared decision-making, treatment efficacy and safety, treatment initiation, treatment follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Clinical Protocols, Humans, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review