Cited by 22Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Neural mechanisms of emotional health in traumatic brain injury patients undergoing rTMS treatment

Open access
Sultana, Tajwar, Hasan, Muhammad Abul, Kang, Xiaojian, Liou-Johnson, Victoria, Adamson, Maheen Mausoof, Razi, Adeel·2023·Molecular Psychiatry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Emotional dysregulation such as that seen in depression, are a long-term consequence of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), that can be improved by using neuromodulation treatments such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Previous studies provide insights into the changes in functional connectivity related to general emotional health after the application of rTMS procedures in patients with TBI. However, these studies provide little understanding of the underlying neuronal mechanisms that drive the improvement of the emotional health in these patients. The current study focuses on inferring the effective (causal) connectivity changes and their association with emotional health, after rTMS treatment of cognitive problems in TBI patients ( N = 32). Specifically, we used resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) together with spectral dynamic causal model (spDCM) to investigate changes in brain effective connectivity, before and after the application of high frequency (10 Hz) rTMS over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We investigated the effective connectivity of the cortico-limbic network comprised of 11 regions of interest (ROIs) which are part of the default mode, salience, and executive control networks, known to be implicated in emotional processing. The results indicate that overall, among extrinsic connections, the strength of excitatory connections decreased while that of inhibitory connections increased after the neuromodulation. The cardinal region in the analysis was dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) which is considered to be the most influenced during emotional health disorders. Our findings implicate the altered connectivity of dACC with left anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex, after the application of rTMS, as a potential neural mechanism underlying improvement of emotional health. Our investigation highlights the importance of these brain regions as treatment targets in emotional processing in TBI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41380-023-02159-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DLPFC plays a critical role in emotion regulation, working memory, and executive functioning; these are impaired in individuals with a history of concussion and shown to improve after rTMS targeted at the DLPFC.

    “In addition to its role in depression, the DLPFC plays a critical role in emotion regulation, working memory, and executive functioning. These are all impaired in individuals with a history of concussion and shown to improve after rTMS targeted at the DLPFC (22, 23).”

    From Adaptive trial for the treatment of depressive symptoms associated with concussion using accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (ADEPT): rationale, design and methods (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Results (Behavioral analysis; page unavailable) report improved emotional-health scores after rTMS, and the Conclusion says stimulation of the left DLPFC helped emotional health in patients with TBI. But the Conclusion explicitly says it failed to influence executive function. The cited passages do not establish improved working memory or improvement across all three functions in people with a history of concussion. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 97 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. [1]Goldstein M Traumatic brain injury: a silent epidemic Ann Neurol 1990 27 327 327 2327740
  2. [3]Masel BE DeWitt DS Traumatic brain injury: a disease process, not an event J Neurotrauma 2010 27 1529 40 20504161
  3. [4]Rao V Lyketsos C Neuropsychiatric sequelae of traumatic brain injury Psychosomatics. 2000 41 95 103 10749946
  4. [5]Emery CA Barlow KM Brooks BL Max JE Villavicencio-Requis A Gnanakumar V A systematic review of psychiatric, psychological, and behavioural outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents Can J Psychiatry 2016 61 259 69 27254800 PMC4841286
  5. [7]Emilien G Waltregny A Traumatic brain injury, cognitive and emotional dysfunction. Impact of clinical neuropsychology research Acta Neurol Belg 1996 96 89 101 8711991
  6. [9]Marklund N Bellander BM Godbolt AK Levin H McCrory P Thelin EP Treatments and rehabilitation in the acute and chronic state of traumatic brain injury J Intern Med 2019 285 608 30883980 PMC6527474
  7. [11]Oberman LM Exley S Philip NS Siddiqi SH Adamson MM Brody DL Use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive symptoms associated with concussion in military populations J Head Trauma Rehabil 2020 35 388 33165152 PMC7664843
  8. [12]Herrold AA Siddiqi SH Livengood SL Bender Pape TL Higgins JP Adamson MM Customizing TMS applications in traumatic brain injury using neuroimaging J Head Trauma Rehabil 2020 35 401 11 33165153
  9. [13]Mayer AR Ling JM Allen EA Klimaj SD Yeo RA Hanlon FM Static and dynamic intrinsic connectivity following mild traumatic brain injury J Neurotrauma 2015 32 1046 55 25318005 PMC4504345
  10. [14]McDonald BC Saykin AJ McAllister TW Functional MRI of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): Progress and perspectives from the first decade of studies Brain Imaging Behav 2012 6 193 207 22618832 PMC3962305
  11. [16]Sharp DJ Scott G Leech R Network dysfunction after traumatic brain injury Nat Rev Neurol 2014 10 156 66 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.15 24514870 · DOI
  12. [17]Bonnelle V Leech R Kinnunen KM Ham TE Beckmann CF de Boissezon X Default mode network connectivity predicts sustained attention deficits after traumatic brain injury J Neurosci 2011 31 13442 51 21940437 PMC6623308
  13. [18]Wu SCJ Jenkins LM Apple AC Petersen J Xiao F Wang L Longitudinal fMRI task reveals neural plasticity in default mode network with disrupted executive-default coupling and selective attention after traumatic brain injury Brain Imaging Behav 2020 14 1638 50 30937828
  14. [19]van der Horn HJ Scheenen ME de Koning ME Liemburg EJ Spikman JM van der Naalt J The default mode network as a biomarker of persistent complaints after mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study J Neurotrauma 2017 34 3262 9 28882089
  15. [20]Lancaster K Venkatesan UM Lengenfelder J Genova HM Default mode network connectivity predicts emotion recognition and social integration after traumatic brain injury Front Neurol 2019 10 825 31447760 PMC6696510
  16. [21]Iraji A Benson RR Welch RD O’Neil BJ Woodard JL Ayaz SI Resting state functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury at the acute stage: independent component and seed-based analyses J Neurotrauma 2015 32 1031 45 25285363 PMC4504339
  17. [22]Zhou Y Milham MP Lui YW Miles L Reaume J Sodickson DK Default-mode network disruption in mild traumatic brain injury Radiology 2012 265 882 92 23175546 PMC3504316
  18. [23]Sharp DJ Beckmann CF Greenwood R Kinnunen KM Bonnelle V De Boissezon X Default mode network functional and structural connectivity after traumatic brain injury Brain. 2011 134 2233 47 21841202
  19. [24]De Simoni S Grover PJ Jenkins PO Honeyfield L Quest RA Ross E Disconnection between the default mode network and medial temporal lobes in post-traumatic amnesia Brain 2016 139 3137 50 27797805 PMC5382939
  20. [25]Sheth C Rogowska J Legarreta M McGlade E Yurgelun-Todd D Functional connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex in Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury Behav Brain Res 2021 396 112882 32853657
  21. [26]Moreno-López L Sahakian BJ Manktelow A Menon DK Stamatakis EA Depression following traumatic brain injury: a functional connectivity perspective Brain Inj 2016 30 1319 28 27467890
  22. [27]Han K Chapman SB Krawczyk DC Altered amygdala connectivity in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury and comorbid depressive symptoms Front Neurol 2015 6 4 26581959 PMC4631949
  23. [28]Raichle ME The brain’s default mode network Annu Rev Neurosci 2015 38 433 47 25938726
  24. [30]Dailey NS Smith R Vanuk JR Raikes AC Killgore WDS Resting-state functional connectivity as a biomarker of aggression in mild traumatic brain injury Neuroreport 2018 29 1413 7 30204638
  25. [31]Howlett JR Nelson LD Stein MB Mental health consequences of traumatic brain injury Biol Psychiatry 2022 91 413 20 34893317 PMC8849136
  26. [33]Hoy KE Mcqueen S Elliot D Herring SE Maller JJ Fitzgerald PB A pilot investigation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic brain injury depression: safety, tolerability, and efficacy J Neurotrauma 2019 36 2092 8 30712461
  27. [34]Lee SA Kim MK Effect of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on depression and cognition of patients with traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial Med Sci Monit 2018 24 8789 30513530 PMC6289027
  28. [36]Siddiqi SH Trapp NT Hacker CD Laumann TO Kandala S Hong X Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with resting-state network targeting for treatment-resistant depression in traumatic brain injury: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded pilot study J Neurotrauma 2019 36 1361 74 30381997 PMC6909726
  29. [37]Siddiqi SH Trapp NT Shahim P Hacker CD Laumann TO Kandala S Individualized connectome-targeted transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropsychiatric sequelae of repetitive traumatic brain injury in a retired NFL player J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2019 31 254 63 30945588
  30. [38]Stilling J Paxman E Mercier L Gan LS Wang M Amoozegar F Treatment of persistent post-traumatic headache and post-concussion symptoms using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a pilot, double-blind, randomized controlled trial J Neurotrauma 2020 37 312 23 31530227
  31. [39]Siddiqi SH Trapp NT Shahim P Hacker CD Laumann TO Kandala S Individualized connectome-targeted transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropsychiatric sequelae of repetitive traumatic brain injury in a retired NFL player J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2019 31 254 63 30945588
  32. [40]Friston KJ Harrison L Penny W Dynamical causal modelling Neuroimage 2003 19 1273 302 12948688
  33. [41]Razi A Friston KJ The Connected Brain: causality, models, and intrinsic dynamics IEEE Signal Process Mag 2016 33 14 55
  34. [42]Friston KJ Kahan J Biswal B Razi AA DCM for resting state fMRI Neuroimage. 2014 94 396 407 24345387 PMC4073651
  35. [43]Razi A Kahan J Rees G Friston KJ Construct validation of a DCM for resting state fMRI Neuroimage. 2015 106 1 14 25463471 PMC4295921
  36. [44]Almgren H Van de Steen F Kühn S Razi A Friston K Marinazzo D Variability and reliability of effective connectivity within the core default mode network: a multi-site longitudinal spectral DCM study Neuroimage. 2018 183 757 68 30165254 PMC6215332
  37. [45]van der Horn HJ Liemburg EJ Aleman A Spikman JM van der Naalt J Brain networks subserving emotion regulation and adaptation after mild traumatic brain injury J Neurotrauma 2016 33 1 9 25962860
  38. [46]Bornhofen C Mcdonald S Emotion perception deficits following traumatic brain injury: a review of the evidence and rationale for intervention J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2008 14 511 25 18577280
  39. [47]Hogeveen J Salvi C Grafman J ‘Emotional intelligence’: lessons from lesions Trends Neurosci 2016 39 694 705 27647325 PMC5807001
  40. [48]Hays RD Sherbourne CD Mazel RM The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0 Health Econ 1993 2 217 27 8275167
  41. [50]Pruim RHR Mennes M van Rooij D Llera A Buitelaar JK Beckmann CF ICA-AROMA: a robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data Neuroimage 2015 112 267 77 25770991
  42. [51]Calhoun VD Adali T Pearlson GD Pekar JJ A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis Hum Brain Mapp 2001 14 140 51 11559959 PMC6871952
  43. [52]Shirer WR Ryali S Rykhlevskaia E Menon V Greicius MD Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns Cereb Cortex 2012 22 158 65 21616982 PMC3236795
  44. [53]Tzourio-Mazoyer N Landeau B Papathanassiou D Crivello F Etard O Delcroix N Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain Neuroimage. 2002 15 273 89 11771995
  45. [54]Zeidman P Jafarian A Corbin N Seghier ML Razi A Price CJ A guide to group effective connectivity analysis, part 1: first level analysis with DCM for fMRI Neuroimage. 2019 200 174 90 31226497 PMC6711459
  46. [55]Razi A Seghier ML Zhou Y McColgan P Zeidman P Park HJ Large-scale DCMs for resting-state fMRI Netw Neurosci 2017 1 222 41 29400357 PMC5796644
  47. [56]Friston KJ Litvak V Oswal A Razi A Stephan KE Van Wijk BCM Bayesian model reduction and empirical Bayes for group (DCM) studies Neuroimage. 2016 128 413 31 26569570 PMC4767224
  48. [57]Zeidman P Jafarian A Seghier ML Litvak V Cagnan H Price CJ A guide to group effective connectivity analysis, part 2: second level analysis with PEB Neuroimage. 2019 200 12 25 31226492 PMC6711451
  49. [58]Xia M Wang J He Y BrainNet viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics PLoS One 2013 8 e68910 23861951 PMC3701683
  50. [59]Tik M Hoffmann A Sladky R Tomova L Hummer A Navarro de Lara L Towards understanding rTMS mechanism of action: stimulation of the DLPFC causes network-specific increase in functional connectivity Neuroimage. 2017 162 289 96 28912081
  51. [60]Dichter GS Gibbs D Smoski MJ A systematic review of relations between resting-state functional-MRI and treatment response in major depressive disorder J Affect Disord 2015 172 8 17 25451389 PMC4375066
  52. [61]Cash R Zalesky A Thomson RH Tian Y Cocchi L Fitzgerald PB Subgenual functional connectivity predicts antidepressant treatment response to transcranial magnetic stimulation: independent validation and evaluation of personalization Biol Psychiatry 2019 86 e5 7 30670304
  53. [63]Baeken C Marinazzo D Wu GR Van Schuerbeek P De Mey J Marchetti I Accelerated HF-rTMS in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: Insights from subgenual anterior cingulate functional connectivity World J Biol Psychiatry 2014 15 286 97 24447053
  54. [64]Paus T Castro-Alamancos MA Petrides M Cortico-cortical connectivity of the human mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex and its modulation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation Eur J Neurosci 2001 14 1405 11 11703468
  55. [65]Teneback CC Nahas Z Speer AM Molloy M Stallings LE Spicer KM Changes in prefrontal cortex and paralimbic activity in depression following two weeks of daily left prefrontal TMS J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1999 11 426 35 10570754
  56. [66]Tik M Woletz M Schuler AL Vasileiadi M Cash RFH Zalesky A Acute TMS/fMRI response explains offline TMS network effects – an interleaved TMS-fMRI study Neuroimage. 2023 267 119833 36572133
  57. [67]Lan MJ Chhetry BT Liston C Mann JJ Dubin M Transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex induces brain morphological changes in regions associated with a treatment resistant major depressive episode; an exploratory analysis Brain Stimul 2016 9 577 27017072 PMC5554068
  58. [69]Meyer BM Rabl U Huemer J Bartova L Kalcher K Provenzano J Prefrontal networks dynamically related to recovery from major depressive disorder: a longitudinal pharmacological fMRI study Transl Psychiatry 2019 9 1 10 30718459 PMC6362173
  59. [70]Grimm S Beck J Schuepbach D Hell D Boesiger P Bermpohl F Imbalance between left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in major depression is linked to negative emotional judgment: an fMRI study in severe major depressive disorder Biol Psychiatry 2008 63 369 76 17888408
  60. [71]Chen F Ke J Qi R Xu Q Zhong Y Liu T Increased inhibition of the amygdala by the mPFC may reflect a resilience factor in post-traumatic stress disorder: a resting-state fMRI granger causality analysis Front Psychiatry 2018 0 516 PMC6204490 30405457
  61. [72]Menon V Uddin LQ Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function Brain Struct Funct 2010 214 655 20512370 PMC2899886
  62. [74]Modinos G Ormel J Aleman A Activation of anterior insula during self-reflection PLoS One 2009 4 e4618 19242539 PMC2643476
  63. [76]Medford N Critchley HD Conjoint activity of anterior insular and anterior cingulate cortex: awareness and response Brain Struct Funct 2010 214 535 20512367 PMC2886906
  64. [77]Taylor KS Seminowicz DA Davis KD Two systems of resting state connectivity between the insula and cingulate cortex Hum Brain Mapp 2009 30 2731 19072897 PMC6871122
  65. [78]Horn DI Yu C Steiner J Buchmann J Kaufmann J Osoba A Glutamatergic and resting-state functional connectivity correlates of severity in major depression – the role of pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula Front Syst Neurosci 2010 0 33 PMC2914530 20700385
  66. [80]Gusnard DA Akbudak E Shulman GL Raichle ME Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 98 4259 64 11259662 PMC31213
  67. [82]Buckner RL Andrews-Hanna JR Schacter DL The Brain’s default network Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008 1124 1 38 18400922
  68. [83]Raichle ME MacLeod AM Snyder AZ Powers WJ Gusnard DA Shulman GL A default mode of brain function Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 98 676 82 11209064 PMC14647
  69. [84]Huijbers W Pennartz CMA Cabeza R Daselaar SM The hippocampus is coupled with the default network during memory retrieval but not during memory encoding PLoS One 2011 6 e17463 21494597 PMC3073934
  70. [85]Jones-Gotman M Zatorre RJ Olivier A Andermann F Cendes F Staunton H Learning and retention of words and designs following excision from medial or lateral temporal-lobe structures Neuropsychologia. 1997 35 63 973 9226658
  71. [86]Kennepohl S Sziklas V Garver KE Wagner DD Jones-Gotman M Memory and the medial temporal lobe: hemispheric specialization reconsidered Neuroimage 2007 36 969 78 17498975
  72. [87]Tulving E Kapur S Craik FIM Moscovitch M Houle S Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994 91 2016 8134342 PMC43300
  73. [88]Papma JM Smits M de Groot M Mattace Raso FU van der Lugt A Vrooman HA The effect of hippocampal function, volume and connectivity on posterior cingulate cortex functioning during episodic memory fMRI in mild cognitive impairment Eur Radio 2017 27 3716 PMC5544779 28289940
  74. [89]Irimia A Maher AS Chaudhari NN Chowdhury NF Jacobs EB Acute cognitive deficits after traumatic brain injury predict Alzheimer’s disease-like degradation of the human default mode network GeroScience 2020 42 1411 29 32743786 PMC7525415
  75. [90]Johnson B Zhang K Gay M Horovitz S Hallett M Sebastianelli W Alteration of brain default network in subacute phase of injury in concussed individuals: resting-state fMRI study Neuroimage 2012 59 511 8 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.081 21846504 PMC3196274 · DOI
  76. [91]Natu VS Lin JJ Burks A Arora A Rugg MD Lega B Stimulation of the posterior cingulate cortex impairs episodic memory encoding J Neurosci 2019 39 7173 82 31358651 PMC6733540
  77. [92]Sours C Zhuo J Roys S Shanmuganathan K Gullapalli RP Disruptions in resting state functional connectivity and cerebral blood flow in mild traumatic brain injury patients PLoS One 2015 10 e0134019 26241476 PMC4524606
  78. [93]Sridharan D Levitin DJ Menon V A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008 105 12569 74 18723676 PMC2527952
  79. [94]Kaiser RH Andrews-Hanna JR Spielberg JM Warren SL Sutton BP Miller GA Distracted and down: neural mechanisms of affective interference in subclinical depression Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2015 10 654 25062838 PMC4420741
  80. [97]Fatfouta R Meshi D Merkl A Heekeren HR Accepting unfairness by a significant other is associated with reduced connectivity between medial prefrontal and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex Soc Neurosci 2018 13 61 73 27813717
  81. [98]Schiena G, Franco G, Boscutti A, Delvecchio G, Maggioni E, Brambilla P. Connectivity changes in major depressive disorder after rTMS: a review of functional and structural connectivity data. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021;30:e59.

Authors
Sultana, T., Hasan, M. A., Kang, X., Liou-Johnson, V., Adamson, M. M., & Razi, A.
Affiliations
  • NED University of Engineering and Technology (PK)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
Corresponding author
Razi, Adeel
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2023-07-06
Volume
28
Issue
12
Pages
5150-5158
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W4383371964
Cited by
22
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (DP200100757, DE170100128)
  • Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (1194910)
  • Wellcome Trust (203147/Z/16/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, emotional well-being, emotional dysregulation, effective connectivity, dynamic causal modeling, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, medial prefrontal cortex, cortico-limbic network, default mode network, salience network, frontoparietal network, neuromodulation, depression
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review