A Crh-defined insular cortex–brainstem–thalamic circuit regulates anxiety-related behavioral states
Abstract
Anxiety disorders are among the most prevalent and debilitating psychiatric conditions, yet the neural circuits underlying anxiety-related states remain incompletely understood. Here we identify a cortical-brainstem-thalamic pathway in which Crh-expressing neurons in the anterior and middle insular cortex (a/mIC) engage the parabrachial nucleus (PBN), which in turn recruits the posterior paraventricular thalamic nucleus (pPVT) to contribute to anxiety-related behavior. Single-cell calcium imaging reveals that the predator odorant 2-methyl-2-thiazoline (2-MT) and footshock recruit partially overlapping populations of PBN-projecting a/mIC neurons; neurons activated by both stimuli exhibit increased activity during open-arm approach in the elevated plus maze. Exposure to 2-MT increases corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) signals in the PBN, where CRF enhances PBN neuronal excitability and CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1) signaling facilitates a/mIC-terminal-evoked firing. Inhibition of Crh⁺ a/mIC-PBN projections, Crh knockdown in the a/mIC, or blockade of CRFR1 signaling within the PBN attenuates 2-MT-induced anxiety-like behavior. Human neuroimaging further reveals stronger functional coupling within a putative homologous aIC-PBN-pPVT network in individuals with anxiety symptoms, and the strength of this coupling correlates with anxiety severity. Together, these findings define a molecularly specified insular circuit that contributes to anxiety-related behavioral states.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Aversive state processing in the posterior insular cortex
Gehrlach, D. A., Dolensek, N., Klein, A. S., Roy Chowdhury, R., Matthys, A., Junghänel, M., Gaitanos, T. N., Podgornik, A., Black, T. D., Reddy Vaka, N., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0469-1 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Dopaminergic and glutamatergic microdomains in a subset of rodent mesoaccumbens axons
Zhang, S., Qi, J., Li, X., Wang, H.-L., Britt, J. P., Hoffman, A. F., Bonci, A., Lupica, C. R., & Morales, M. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3945 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- An, Z.-Y., Liu, M.-Z., Yuan, J.-Y., Song, M.-Y., Yang, X.-M., He, Y., & Mu, D.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Guangdong Institute of Intelligence Science and Technology (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- He, Yi
- Mu, Di
- Venue
- Molecular Psychiatry
- Published
- 2026-10-30
- ISSN
- 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5578
- OpenAlex
- W7224918435
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- anxiety, insula, parabrachial nucleus, corticotropin-releasing factor, CRF1 receptor, footshock, elevated plus maze, single-cell calcium imaging, functional connectivity, anxiety levels, human neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review