Aberrant working memory processing in major depression: evidence from multivoxel pattern classification
Open accessAbstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is often accompanied by severe impairments in working memory (WM). Neuroimaging studies investigating the mechanisms underlying these impairments have produced conflicting results. It remains unclear whether MDD patients show hyper- or hypoactivity in WM-related brain regions and how potential aberrations in WM processing may contribute to the characteristic dysregulation of cognition-emotion interactions implicated in the maintenance of the disorder. In order to shed light on these questions and to overcome limitations of previous studies, we applied a multivoxel pattern classification approach to investigate brain activity in large samples of MDD patients (N = 57) and matched healthy controls (N = 61) during a WM task that incorporated positive, negative, and neutral stimuli. Results showed that patients can be distinguished from healthy controls with good classification accuracy based on functional activation patterns. ROI analyses based on the classification weight maps showed that during WM, patients had higher activity in the left DLPFC and the dorsal ACC. Furthermore, regions of the default-mode network (DMN) were less deactivated in patients. As no performance differences were observed, we conclude that patients required more effort, indexed by more activity in WM-related regions, to successfully perform the task. This increased effort might be related to difficulties in suppressing task-irrelevant information reflected by reduced deactivation of regions within the DMN. Effects were most pronounced for negative and neutral stimuli, thus pointing toward important implications of aberrations in WM processes in cognition-emotion interactions in MDD.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In MDD subjects performing at the same level as controls, MDD is linked to potentiated pgACC, dACC, and left dlPFC; pgACC hyperactivation persists after remission.
“in studies in which MDD subjects performed at the same level as controls, MDD has been linked to potentiated pgACC, dACC and left dlPFC [16,237,238] and pgACC hyperactivation persisted after remission [239].”
From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [237]
The Discussion and ROI results report greater dACC and left DLPFC activation in MDD patients than controls despite similar working-memory performance. They do not establish pgACC hyperactivation. The remission statement has a separate citation [239] in the citing sentence, so it is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 41
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [30]30. Chen Y-W, Lin C-J. Combining SVMs with various feature selection strategies. Feature extraction.. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p. 315-24.
- Authors
- Gärtner, M., Ghisu, M. E., Scheidegger, M., Bönke, L., Fan, Y., Stippl, A., Herrera-Melendez, A.-L., Metz, S., Winnebeck, E., Fissler, M., Henning, A., Bajbouj, M., Borgwardt, K., Barnhofer, T., & Grimm, S.
- Affiliations
- MSB Medical School Berlin (DE)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Universität Greifswald (DE)
- SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gärtner, Matti
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuropsychopharmacology
- Published
- 2018-05-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1972-1979
- ISSN
- 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
- 1740-634X
- PMC
- PMC6046039
- OpenAlex
- W2802524083
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- European Commission (H2020, 634541)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GR 4510/2-1/, 4510/2-1, GR 4510)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (634541)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, working memory, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, default mode network, cognitive effort, emotion and cognition, emotional stimuli, brain deactivation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review