Cited by 56Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Lithium continuation therapy following ketamine in patients with treatment resistant unipolar depression: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Costi, Sara, Soleimani, Laili, Glasgow, Andrew, Brallier, Jess, Spivack, John, Schwartz, Jaclyn, Levitch, Cara F., Richards, Samantha +8 more·2019·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine is associated with rapid but transient antidepressant effects in patients with treatment resistant unipolar depression (TRD). Based on work suggesting that ketamine and lithium may share overlapping mechanisms of action, we tested lithium compared to placebo as a continuation strategy following ketamine in subjects with TRD. Participants who met all eligibility criteria and showed at least an initial partial response to a single intravenous infusion of ketamine 0.5 mg/kg were randomized under double-blind conditions to lithium or matching placebo before receiving an additional three infusions of ketamine. Subsequent to the ketamine treatments, participants remained on lithium or placebo during a double-blind continuation phase. The primary study outcome was depression severity as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale compared between the two groups at Study Day 28, which occurred ~2 weeks following the final ketamine of four infusions. Forty-seven participants with TRD were enrolled in the study and underwent an initial ketamine infusion, of whom 34 participants were deemed to have at least a partial antidepressant response and were eligible for randomization. Comparison between treatment with daily oral lithium (n = 18) or matching placebo (n = 16) at the primary outcome showed no difference in depression severity between groups (t 32 = 0.11, p = 0.91, 95% CI [-7.87, 8.76]). There was no difference between lithium and placebo in continuing the acute antidepressant response to ketamine. The identification of a safe and effective strategy for preventing depression relapse following an acute course of ketamine treatment remains an important goal for future studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41386-019-0365-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Calibrated AMPAR facilitation may help sustain prefrontal drive, preserve signal-to-noise, and extend remission without excessive excitatory load.

    “calibrated AMPAR facilitation may help sustain prefrontal drive, preserve signal-to-noise, and extend remission without excessive excitatory load [380,381,382].”

    From Synaptic Plasticity—Intrinsic Excitability and Antidepressant Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [381]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses ketamine-related prefrontal synapses and a rationale for testing lithium to prolong its antidepressant response. Searches for AMPAR facilitation and signal-to-noise found no passage addressing whether it could sustain prefrontal drive, extend remission, or avoid excessive excitatory load. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 56

Authors
Costi, S., Soleimani, L., Glasgow, A., Brallier, J., Spivack, J., Schwartz, J., Levitch, C. F., Richards, S., Hoch, M., Stade, E. C., Welch, A., Collins, K. A., Feder, A., Iosifescu, D. V., Charney, D. S., & Murrough, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Fordham University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Murrough, James W.
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2019-03-11
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
1812-1819
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2921871712
Cited by
56
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (2013098, 2013089)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
ketamine, lithium, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, continuation treatment, NMDA receptor antagonists, antidepressant response, depression relapse prevention, intravenous ketamine infusion
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Lithium Compounds, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review