DeepCC: a novel deep learning-based framework for cancer molecular subtype classification
Open accessAbstract
Molecular subtyping of cancer is a critical step towards more individualized therapy and provides important biological insights into cancer heterogeneity. Although gene expression signature-based classification has been widely demonstrated to be an effective approach in the last decade, the widespread implementation has long been limited by platform differences, batch effects, and the difficulty to classify individual patient samples. Here, we describe a novel supervised cancer classification framework, deep cancer subtype classification (DeepCC), based on deep learning of functional spectra quantifying activities of biological pathways. In two case studies about colorectal and breast cancer classification, DeepCC classifiers and DeepCC single sample predictors both achieved overall higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared with other widely used classification methods such as random forests (RF), support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and multinomial logistic regression algorithms. Simulation analysis based on random subsampling of genes demonstrated the robustness of DeepCC to missing data. Moreover, deep features learned by DeepCC captured biological characteristics associated with distinct molecular subtypes, enabling more compact within-subtype distribution and between-subtype separation of patient samples, and therefore greatly reduce the number of unclassifiable samples previously. In summary, DeepCC provides a novel cancer classification framework that is platform independent, robust to missing data, and can be used for single sample prediction facilitating clinical implementation of cancer molecular subtyping.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PathTIGR consistently outperformed seven state-of-the-art deep learning frameworks (BPformer, DeepCC, HyperTMO, IRnet, MOGAT, MOGDx, and MOGONET) across all evaluated metrics on multiple immunotherapy datasets.
“Despite their sophisticated computational frameworks, independent evaluation across multiple immunotherapy datasets revealed consistent underperformance relative to PathTIGR across all evaluated metrics (Fig. 5, A and B, and fig. S3).”
From PathTIGR: A pathway topology-informed graph representation learning framework for immunotherapy response prediction (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625 · see citing works
Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11412 · Cited by 12,129 · see citing works
Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data
Leek, J. T., Scharpf, R. B., Bravo, H. C., Simcha, D., Langmead, B., Johnson, W. E., Geman, D., Baggerly, K., & Irizarry, R. A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2825 · Cited by 2,196 · see citing works
Monti, S., Tamayo, P., Mesirov, J., & Golub, T. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1023949509487 · Cited by 2,116 · see citing works
Batch effect removal methods for microarray gene expression data integration: a survey
Lazar, C., Meganck, S., Taminau, J., Steenhoff, D., Coletta, A., Molter, C., Weiss-Solis, D. Y., Duque, R., Bersini, H., & Nowe, A. (2013) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbs037 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- [1]Breugom AJ Adjuvant chemotherapy and relative survival of patients with stage II colon cancer—A EURECCA international comparison between the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, England, Ireland, Belgium, and Lithuania Eur. J. Cancer 2016 63 110 117 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.04.017 27299663 · DOI
- [2]Dotan E Cohen SJ Challenges in the management of stage II colon cancer Semin Oncol. 2011 38 511 520 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.05.005 21810510 PMC3242408 · DOI
- [3]Jass JR Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features Histopathology 2007 50 113 130 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02549.x 17204026 · DOI
- [4]Linnekamp JF Wang X Medema JP Vermeulen L Colorectal cancer heterogeneity and targeted therapy: a case for molecular disease subtypes Cancer Res. 2015 75 245 249 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2240 25593032 · DOI
- [5]Hoadley KA Multiplatform analysis of 12 cancer types reveals molecular classification within and across tissues of origin Cell 2014 158 929 944 10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.049 25109877 PMC4152462 · DOI
- [6]Wang X Dissecting cancer heterogeneity–an unsupervised classification approach Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013 45 2574 2579 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.08.014 24004832 · DOI
- [8]Brunet J-P Tamayo P Golub TR Mesirov JP Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2004 101 4164 4169 10.1073/pnas.0308531101 15016911 PMC384712 · DOI · Paper page
- [9]Haury A-C Gestraud P Vert J-P The influence of feature selection methods on accuracy, stability and interpretability of molecular signatures PLoS ONE 2011 6 e28210 10.1371/journal.pone.0028210 22205940 PMC3244389 · DOI
- [10]Ein-Dor L Kela I Getz G Givol D Domany E Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set? Bioinformatics 2005 21 171 178 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth469 15308542 · DOI
- [11]Drier Y Domany E Do two machine-learning based prognostic signatures for breast cancer capture the same biological processes? PLoS ONE 2011 6 e17795 10.1371/journal.pone.0017795 21423753 PMC3056769 · DOI
- [12]Engchuan W., Meechai A., Tongsima S., Chan J. H. Cross-platform pathway activity transformation and classification of microarray data. In Computational Intelligence in Information Systems. 139–148 (Springer International Publishing, 2015).
- [14]Johnson WE Li C Rabinovic A Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods Biostatistics 2007 8 118 127 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037 16632515 · DOI · Paper page
- [16]Yan, K., et al. Comprehensive autoencoder for prostate recognition on MR images. In 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). 1190–1194 (2016).
- [17]Kim B., Sung Y. S., Suk H. Deep feature learning for pulmonary nodule classification in a lung CT. In 2016 4th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), 1–3 (IEEE, 2016).
- [18]Spanhol F. A., Oliveira L. S., Petitjean C., Heutte L. Breast cancer histopathological image classification using ConvolutionalNeural Networks. In 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2560–2567 (IEEE, 2016).
- [19]Xu Y Large scale tissue histopathology image classification, segmentation, and visualization via deep convolutional activation features BMC Bioinform. 2017 18 281 10.1186/s12859-017-1685-x PMC5446756 28549410 · DOI
- [20]Chen Y Li Y Narayan R Subramanian A Xie X Gene expression inference with deep learning Bioinformatics 2016 32 1832 1839 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw074 26873929 PMC4908320 · DOI
- [21]Singh R Lanchantin J Robins G Qi Y DeepChrome: deep-learning for predicting gene expression from histone modifications Bioinformatics 2016 32 i639 i648 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw427 27587684 · DOI
- [22]Zhou J Troyanskaya OG Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model Nat. Methods 2015 12 931 934 10.1038/nmeth.3547 26301843 PMC4768299 · DOI · Paper page
- [24]Ibrahim R Yousri NA Ismail MA El-Makky NM Multi-level gene/MiRNA feature selection using deep belief nets and active learning Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2014 2014 3957 3960 25570858
- [25]Fakoor R., Ladhak F., Nazi A., Huber M. Using deep learning to enhance cancer diagnosis and classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ACM New York, USA, 2013). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rasool_Fakoor/publication/281857285_Using_deep_learning_to_enhance_cancer_diagnosis_and_classification/links/5982f029458515a60df82098/Using-deep-learning-to-enhance-cancer-diagnosis-and-classification.pdf.
- [26]Engchuan W Chan JH Pathway activity transformation for multi-class classification of lung cancer datasets Neurocomputing 2015 165 81 89 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.08.096 · DOI
- [27]Young MR Craft DL Pathway-Informed Classification System (PICS) for Cancer Analysis Using Gene Expression Data Cancer Inform. 2016 15 151 161 10.4137/CIN.S40088 27486299 PMC4965015 · DOI
- [29]Krawczuk J Łukaszuk T The feature selection bias problem in relation to high-dimensional gene data Artif. Intell. Med 2016 66 63 71 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.11.001 26674595 · DOI
- [30]Guinney J The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer Nat. Med 2015 21 1350 1356 10.1038/nm.3967 26457759 PMC4636487 · DOI · Paper page
- [31]Chia SK A 50-gene intrinsic subtype classifier for prognosis and prediction of benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen Clin. Cancer Res. 2012 18 4465 4472 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0286 22711706 PMC3743663 · DOI
- [32]LeCun Y Bengio Y Hinton G Deep learning Nature 2015 521 436 444 10.1038/nature14539 26017442 · DOI · Paper page
- [33]de Souto MCP Jaskowiak PA Costa IG Impact of missing data imputation methods on gene expression clustering and classification BMC Bioinform. 2015 16 64 10.1186/s12859-015-0494-3 PMC4350881 25888091 · DOI
- [34]Hinton GE Salakhutdinov RR Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks Science 2006 313 504 507 10.1126/science.1127647 16873662 · DOI · Paper page
- [35]Parker JS Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes J. Clin. Oncol. 2009 27 1160 1167 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1370 19204204 PMC2667820 · DOI
- [36]De Sousa E Poor-prognosis colon cancer is defined by a molecularly distinct subtype and develops from serrated precursor lesions Nat. Med. 2013 19 614 618 10.1038/nm.3174 23584090 · DOI · Paper page
- [37]Fessler E A multidimensional network approach reveals microRNAs as determinants of the mesenchymal colorectal cancer subtype Oncogene 2016 35 6026 6037 10.1038/onc.2016.134 27157610 PMC5116560 · DOI
- [38]Krijgsman O A diagnostic gene profile for molecular subtyping of breast cancer associated with treatment response Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012 133 37 47 10.1007/s10549-011-1683-z 21814749 · DOI
- [39]O’Connell MJ Relationship between tumor gene expression and recurrence in four independent studies of patients with stage II/III colon cancer treated with surgery alone or surgery plus adjuvant fluorouracil plus leucovorin J. Clin. Oncol. 2010 28 3937 3944 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.9538 20679606 PMC2940392 · DOI
- [40]Van Laar RK An online gene expression assay for determining adjuvant therapy eligibility in patients with stage 2 or 3 colon cancer Br. J. Cancer 2010 103 1852 1857 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605970 21119668 PMC3008603 · DOI
- [41]Salazar R Gene expression signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage II and III colorectal cancer J. Clin. Oncol. 2011 29 17 24 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.1077 21098318 · DOI
- [42]Kennedy RD Development and independent validation of a prognostic assay for stage II colon cancer using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue J. Clin. Oncol. 2011 29 4620 4626 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.4498 22067406 · DOI
- [43]Lenehan PF Generation and external validation of a tumor-derived 5-gene prognostic signature for recurrence of lymph node-negative, invasive colorectal carcinoma Cancer 2012 118 5234 5244 10.1002/cncr.27628 22605513 PMC3532613 · DOI
- [44]Agesen TH ColoGuideEx: a robust gene classifier specific for stage II colorectal cancer prognosis Gut 2012 61 1560 1567 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301179 22213796 · DOI
- [45]Sveen A ColoGuidePro: a prognostic 7-gene expression signature for stage III colorectal cancer patients Clin. Cancer Res 2012 18 6001 6010 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3302 22991413 · DOI
- [46]Kandimalla R Genome-wide Discovery and Identification of a Novel miRNA Signature for Recurrence Prediction in Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 2018 24 3867 3877 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3236 29514841 PMC6095767 · DOI
- [47]Roepman P Colorectal cancer intrinsic subtypes predict chemotherapy benefit, deficient mismatch repair and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition Int. J. Cancer 2014 134 552 562 10.1002/ijc.28387 23852808 PMC4234005 · DOI
- [49]Orbach J Principles of Neurodynamics. Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1962 7 218 219 10.1001/archpsyc.1962.01720030064010 · DOI
- [50]Glorot X., Bengio Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 249–256 (PMLR, 2010).
- [51]Bottou L. Large-Scale Machine Learning with Stochastic Gradient Descent. In Proceedings of COMPSTAT’2010. 177–186 (Physica-Verlag HD, 2010).
- [52]Rousseeuw PJ Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis J. Comput. Appl. Math. 1987 20 53 65 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vatansever, S., Schlessinger, A., Wacker, D., Kaniskan, H. Ü., Jin, J., Zhou, M., & Zhang, B. (2021) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21764 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Divate, M., Tyagi, A., Richard, D. J., Prasad, P. A., Gowda, H., & Nagaraj, S. H. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14051185 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Goel, I., Bhaskar, Y., Kumar, N., Singh, S., Amanullah, M., Dhar, R., & Karmakar, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1550407 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Li, X., He, Y., Wu, J., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., Pan, B., Tang, Y., & Han, J. (2026) · PubMed · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aed6373 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Given the rapid advancement of deep learning methodologies in biomedical applications, we conducted rigorous comparison with seven state- of- the-art deep learning frameworks: BPformer ( 43 ), DeepCC ( 44 ), HyperTMO ( 45 ), IRnet ( 26 ), MOGAT ( 46 ), MOGDx ( 47 ), and MOGONET ( 48 ).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gao, F., Wang, W., Tan, M., Zhu, L., Zhang, Y., Fessler, E., Vermeulen, L., & Wang, X.
- Affiliations
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Vermeulen, Louis
- Wang, Xin
- Venue
- Oncogenesis
- Published
- 2019-08-16
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 44-44
- ISSN
- 2157-9024 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6697729
- OpenAlex
- W2968856704
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Oncogenesis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (21101115)
- The Science Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality
- KWF Kankerbestrijding (UVA2014-7245)
- ZonMw (Vidi 016.156.308)
- European Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Keywords
- tumor molecular subtypes, deep learning, gene expression classification, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, batch effects, missing data robustness, platform independence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review