Cited by 707Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Global negative effects of nitrogen deposition on soil microbes

Open access
Zhang, Tian’an, Chen, Han Y H, Ruan, Honghua·2018·The ISME Journal

Abstract

Soil microbes comprise a large portion of the genetic diversity on Earth and influence a large number of important ecosystem processes. Increasing atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition represents a major global change driver; however, it is still debated whether the impacts of N deposition on soil microbial biomass and respiration are ecosystem-type dependent. Moreover, the extent of N deposition impacts on microbial composition remains unclear. Here we conduct a global meta-analysis using 1408 paired observations from 151 studies to evaluate the responses of soil microbial biomass, composition, and function to N addition. We show that nitrogen addition reduced total microbial biomass, bacterial biomass, fungal biomass, biomass carbon, and microbial respiration. Importantly, these negative effects increased with N application rate and experimental duration. Nitrogen addition reduced the fungi to bacteria ratio and the relative abundances of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and gram-negative bacteria and increased gram-positive bacteria. Our structural equation modeling showed that the negative effects of N application on soil microbial abundance and composition led to reduced microbial respiration. The effects of N addition were consistent across global terrestrial ecosystems. Our results suggest that atmospheric N deposition negatively affects soil microbial growth, composition, and function across all terrestrial ecosystems, with more pronounced effects with increasing N deposition rate and duration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41396-018-0096-y

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, T., Chen, H. Y. H., & Ruan, H.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
  • Lakehead University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Han Y H
  • Ruan, Honghua
Venue
The ISME Journal
Published
2018-03-27
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
1817-1825
ISSN
  • 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7370
OpenAlex
W2794529768
Cited by
707
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 9
FWCI
47.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The ISME Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Nanjing Forestry University
  • Government of Jiangsu Province
  • Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  • Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University
  • Chinese Government Scholarship
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFD0600204, 2016YFD0600204)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
nitrogen deposition, soil microbes, microbial biomass, microbial respiration, soil microbial community composition, fungal to bacterial ratio, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, terrestrial ecosystems, global change
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Carbon, Nitrogen, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Ecosystem, Biomass, Mycorrhizae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review