Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling microbial communities from atrazine contaminated soils promotes the development of biostimulation solutions

Open access
Xu, Xihui, Zarecki, Raphy, Medina, Shlomit, Ofaim, Shany, Liu, Xiaowei, Chen, Chen, Hu, Shunli, Brom, Dan, Gat, Daniella, Porob, Seema, Eizenberg, Hanan, Ronen, Zeev, Jiang, Jiandong, Freilich, Shiri·2019·The ISME Journal

Abstract

Microbial communities play a vital role in biogeochemical cycles, allowing the biodegradation of a wide range of pollutants. The composition of the community and the interactions between its members affect degradation rate and determine the identity of the final products. Here, we demonstrate the application of sequencing technologies and metabolic modeling approaches towards enhancing biodegradation of atrazine—a herbicide causing environmental pollution. Treatment of agriculture soil with atrazine is shown to induce significant changes in community structure and functional performances. Genome-scale metabolic models were constructed for Arthrobacter, the atrazine degrader, and four other non-atrazine degrading species whose relative abundance in soil was changed following exposure to the herbicide. By modeling community function we show that consortia including the direct degrader and non-degrader differentially abundant species perform better than Arthrobacter alone. Simulations predict that growth/degradation enhancement is derived by metabolic exchanges between community members. Based on simulations we designed endogenous consortia optimized for enhanced degradation whose performances were validated in vitro and biostimulation strategies that were tested in pot experiments. Overall, our analysis demonstrates that understanding community function in its wider context, beyond the single direct degrader perspective, promotes the design of biostimulation strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41396-018-0288-5

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Xu, X., Zarecki, R., Medina, S., Ofaim, S., Liu, X., Chen, C., Hu, S., Brom, D., Gat, D., Porob, S., Eizenberg, H., Ronen, Z., Jiang, J., & Freilich, S.
Venue
The ISME Journal
Published
2018-10-05
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
494-508
ISSN
  • 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7370
OpenAlex
W2895609963
Cited by
188
References
8
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling microbial communities from atrazine contaminated soils promotes the development of biostimulation solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41396-018-0288-5
The paper
Xu, X., Zarecki, R., Medina, S., Ofaim, S., Liu, X., Chen, C., Hu, S., Brom, D., Gat, D., Porob, S., Eizenberg, H., Ronen, Z., Jiang, J., & Freilich, S. (2019). Modeling microbial communities from atrazine contaminated soils promotes the development of biostimulation solutions. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0288-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.