Cited by 244Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorTreatment of Major Depression

Meta-analysis of reward processing in major depressive disorder reveals distinct abnormalities within the reward circuit

Open access
Ng, Tommy H., Alloy, Lauren B., Smith, David V.·2019·Translational Psychiatry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Many neuroimaging studies have investigated reward processing dysfunction in major depressive disorder. These studies have led to the common idea that major depressive disorder is associated with blunted responses within the reward circuit, particularly in the ventral striatum. Yet, the link between major depressive disorder and reward-related responses in other regions remains inconclusive, thus limiting our understanding of the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder. To address this issue, we performed a coordinate-based meta-analysis of 41 whole-brain neuroimaging studies encompassing reward-related responses from a total of 794 patients with major depressive disorder and 803 healthy controls. Our findings argue against the common idea that major depressive disorder is primarily linked to deficits within the reward system. Instead, our results demonstrate that major depressive disorder is associated with opposing abnormalities in the reward circuit: hypo-responses in the ventral striatum and hyper-responses in the orbitofrontal cortex. The current findings suggest that dysregulated corticostriatal connectivity may underlie reward-processing abnormalities in major depressive disorder, providing an empirical foundation for a more refined understanding of abnormalities in the reward circuitry in major depressive disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41398-019-0644-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An extensive literature implicates shared alterations in the reward circuitry in MDD, neurodegenerative disorders, and obesity.

    “An extensive literature implicates shared alterations in the reward circuitry in MDD, neurodegenerative disorders, and obesity261-263.”

    From Comorbidity between major depressive disorder and physical diseases: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, mechanisms and management (2023) · cites this paper as [261]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports reward-circuit abnormalities in MDD, specifically reduced ventral-striatal and increased orbitofrontal responses to reward. It does not establish that these alterations are shared with neurodegenerative disorders or obesity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 101 · Cited by 244

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [75]Nusslock R Alloy LB Reward processing and mood-related symptoms: an RDoC and translational neuroscience perspective J. Affect. Disord. 2017 216 3 16 10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.001 28237133 PMC6661152 · DOI

Authors
Ng, T. H., Alloy, L. B., & Smith, D. V.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, David V.
Venue
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2019-11-11
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
293-293
ISSN
2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987350827
Cited by
244
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (MH077908)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, reward processing, reward systems, ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, corticostriatal connectivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Reward, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex, Neuroimaging, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review