'You just don't have the time to keep bringing them back, bringing them back': the experience of primary care dental professionals in England when treating young children with carious teeth
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Caries in the primary dentition affects around one-quarter of children in England. There is uncertainty and varying practice regarding the management of these children within NHS primary dental care. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is an approach that is not well-adopted nationally. This study aims to explore the factors affecting treatment choices for caries management in young children within primary dental care, including the use of SDF. Methods Semi-structured interviews were carried out via video conferencing with general dental practitioners and therapists working in NHS primary care. The topic guide covered factors which influence the management of caries in primary teeth, with SDF-specific questions. These were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Results A total of 13 interviews were conducted with dental professionals working across Yorkshire and the East Midlands. Decision-making for caries management was dependent on inter-related factors, which also influenced SDF use. Treatment decisions were taken on a case-by-case basis, but were influenced by the child, their parents, the dental professional and service factors, along with the clinical technique. Conclusion Many individual- and system-level factors influence treatment decisions for early childhood caries. However, issues relating to remuneration and governance appear to be specific barriers to adoption of SDF in primary dental care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence-based guidelines for managing caries in young children are not routinely implemented in NHS primary care.
“Although evidence-based guidelines have been developed for the management of caries for young children, studies have shown that these are not routinely implemented in NHS primary care [7, 8].”
Cites
Silver diamine fluoride for managing carious lesions: an umbrella review
Seifo, N., Cassie, H., Radford, J. R., & Innes, N. P. T. (2019) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-019-0830-5 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Maguire, A., Clarkson, J. E., Douglas, G. V., Ryan, V., Homer, T., Marshman, Z., McColl, E., Wilson, N., Vale, L., Robertson, M., et al. (2020) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta24010 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Timms, L., Rodd, H., Brocklehurst, P., Deery, C., & Marshman, Z. (2026) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-08442-z
Self-citation
- Authors
- Timms, L., Rodd, H., Deery, C., Brocklehurst, P., & Marshman, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Public Health Wales (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Timms, Laura
- Venue
- British Dental Journal
- Published
- 2023-09-04
- ISSN
- 0007-0610 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5373
- OpenAlex
- W4386416298
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- BDJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR-INF-2643, NIHR301740)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
- Keywords
- early childhood caries, primary teeth, silver diamine fluoride, caries management, general dentists, dental therapists, primary dental care, treatment decision-making, barriers to adoption, remuneration, NHS dental care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review