Cited by 27Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsExtracellular vesicles in disease

Liquid biopsy: creating opportunities in brain space

Open access
Trivedi, Rakesh, Bhat, Krishna P.·2023·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

In recent years, liquid biopsy has emerged as an alternative method to diagnose and monitor tumors. Compared to classical tissue biopsy procedures, liquid biopsy facilitates the repetitive collection of diverse cellular and acellular analytes from various biofluids in a non/minimally invasive manner. This strategy is of greater significance for high-grade brain malignancies such as glioblastoma as the quantity and accessibility of tumors are limited, and there are collateral risks of compromised life quality coupled with surgical interventions. Currently, blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are the most common biofluids used to collect circulating cells and biomolecules of tumor origin. These liquid biopsy analytes have created opportunities for real-time investigations of distinct genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics alterations associated with brain tumors. This review describes different classes of liquid biopsy biomarkers present in the biofluids of brain tumor patients. Moreover, an overview of the liquid biopsy applications, challenges, recent technological advances, and clinical trials in the brain have also been provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41416-023-02446-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liquid biopsy as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional imaging and behavioral assessments facilitates ongoing monitoring of biochemical and molecular alterations in the CNS.

    “The utilization of liquid biopsy as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional imaging and behavioral assessments facilitates the ongoing monitoring of biochemical and molecular alterations in the CNS [181–183].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 356 · Cited by 27

Authors
Trivedi, R., & Bhat, K. P.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Trivedi, Rakesh
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2023-09-26
Volume
129
Issue
11
Pages
1727-1746
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W4387041624
Cited by
27
References
356
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (5R01 CA225963)
  • The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center Startup funds to Krishna P Bhat.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
liquid biopsy, brain tumors, glioblastoma, cerebrospinal fluid, blood biomarkers, circulating tumor cells, tumor markers, non-invasive diagnosis, cancer monitoring, epigenetic modifications, proteomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics
MeSH terms
Liquid Biopsy, Brain, Brain Neoplasms, Humans, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating, Biomarkers, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review