Liquid biopsy: creating opportunities in brain space
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, liquid biopsy has emerged as an alternative method to diagnose and monitor tumors. Compared to classical tissue biopsy procedures, liquid biopsy facilitates the repetitive collection of diverse cellular and acellular analytes from various biofluids in a non/minimally invasive manner. This strategy is of greater significance for high-grade brain malignancies such as glioblastoma as the quantity and accessibility of tumors are limited, and there are collateral risks of compromised life quality coupled with surgical interventions. Currently, blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are the most common biofluids used to collect circulating cells and biomolecules of tumor origin. These liquid biopsy analytes have created opportunities for real-time investigations of distinct genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics alterations associated with brain tumors. This review describes different classes of liquid biopsy biomarkers present in the biofluids of brain tumor patients. Moreover, an overview of the liquid biopsy applications, challenges, recent technological advances, and clinical trials in the brain have also been provided.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Liquid biopsy as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional imaging and behavioral assessments facilitates ongoing monitoring of biochemical and molecular alterations in the CNS.
“The utilization of liquid biopsy as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional imaging and behavioral assessments facilitates the ongoing monitoring of biochemical and molecular alterations in the CNS [181–183].”
From Extracellular vesicles as nanotheranostic platforms for targeted neurological disorder interventions (2024) · cites this paper as [183]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 356 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Trivedi, R., & Bhat, K. P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Trivedi, Rakesh
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2023-09-26
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1727-1746
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- PMC
- PMC10667495
- OpenAlex
- W4387041624
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 356
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (5R01 CA225963)
- The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center Startup funds to Krishna P Bhat.
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Keywords
- liquid biopsy, brain tumors, glioblastoma, cerebrospinal fluid, blood biomarkers, circulating tumor cells, tumor markers, non-invasive diagnosis, cancer monitoring, epigenetic modifications, proteomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics
- MeSH terms
- Liquid Biopsy, Brain, Brain Neoplasms, Humans, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating, Biomarkers, Tumor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review