An organoid-based drug screening identified a menin-MLL inhibitor for endometrial cancer through regulating the HIF pathway
Abstract
Tumor organoids recapitulate pathological properties and would serve as an excellent ex vivo model for drug discovery. Here, we performed an unbiased drug screening on drivers-defined tumor organoids from mouse endometrial cancer, the most prevalent gynecological malignancy in human, with a small molecule library targeting epigenetic factors. Among them, menin-MLL inhibitors MI-136 and MI-463 scored. The therapeutic capacity of MI-136 was further validated in tumor organoids in vitro and an orthotopic model in vivo. CRISPR/cas9-mediated mutations of major components of the menin-MLL complex, Men1, Kmt2a and Ash2l, inhibited the growth of tumor organoids, suggesting that the complex was the target of MI-136. Transcriptome analysis showed that the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway was the most significantly downregulated pathway by MI-136 treatment. Consistently, Men1, Kmt2a, and Ash2l knockout also repressed the expressions of the HIF target genes. Loss of Hif1a or Hif1b partially phenocopied the inhibition of the menin-MLL complex by MI-136 or mutations in term of tumor organoid growth. Further, we found that MEN1 was upregulated in human endometrial cancers, which were tightly correlated with the expression levels of HIF1A, and associated with poor prognosis. Importantly, MI-136 also significantly inhibited the growth of endometrial cancer organoids derived from patients. Thus, our study identified MI-136 as a potential inhibitor for endometrial cancer through regulating the HIF pathway, a novel molecular mechanism distinguished from those in AML and prostate cancer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Technical challenges to rapid and high-throughput screening of 3D organoids have been addressed and surpassed by different means, including alternative plate design or seeding geometries.
“Technical challenges to rapid and high-throughput screening of 3D organoids have been addressed in recent years and surpassed by different means, including alternative plate design or seeding geometries16,151,152.”
From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [152]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Chen, J., Zhao, L., Peng, H., Dai, S., Quan, Y., Wang, M., Wang, J., Bi, Z., Zheng, Y., Zhou, S., Liu, Y., Chen, C., & Na, F.
- Affiliations
- Sichuan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Chong
- Na, Feifei
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Gene Therapy
- Published
- 2020-07-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 112-125
- ISSN
- 0929-1903 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5500
- OpenAlex
- W3039604895
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- the National Key R&D Program of China
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- endometrial cancer, tumor organoids, HIF pathway, hypoxia-inducible factor, MEN1, KMT2A, ASH2L, epigenetic drug targets, HIF1A, drug screening, orthotopic model, prognosis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Female, Humans, Organoids, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Endometrial Neoplasms, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review