Cited by 36Autophagy in Disease and TherapySphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingLysosomal Storage Disorders Research

Sphingosine kinase 1-associated autophagy differs between neurons and astrocytes

Open access
Moruno-Manchon, Jose F., Uzor, Ndidi-Ese, Ambati, Chandrashekar R., Shetty, Vivekananda, Putluri, Nagireddy, Jagannath, Chinnaswamy, McCullough, Louise D., Tsvetkov, Andrey S.·2018·Cell Death & Disease

Abstract

Autophagy is a degradative pathway for removing aggregated proteins, damaged organelles, and parasites. Evidence indicates that autophagic pathways differ between cell types. In neurons, autophagy plays a homeostatic role, compared to a survival mechanism employed by starving non-neuronal cells. We investigated if sphingosine kinase 1 (SK1)-associated autophagy differs between two symbiotic brain cell types—neurons and astrocytes. SK1 synthesizes sphingosine-1-phosphate, which regulates autophagy in non-neuronal cells and in neurons. We found that benzoxazine autophagy inducers upregulate SK1 and neuroprotective autophagy in neurons, but not in astrocytes. Starvation enhances SK1-associated autophagy in astrocytes, but not in neurons. In astrocytes, SK1 is cytoprotective and promotes the degradation of an autophagy substrate, mutant huntingtin, the protein that causes Huntington’s disease. Overexpressed SK1 is unexpectedly toxic to neurons, and its toxicity localizes to the neuronal soma, demonstrating an intricate relationship between the localization of SK1’s activity and neurotoxicity. Our results underscore the importance of cell type-specific autophagic differences in any efforts to target autophagy therapeutically.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41419-018-0599-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autophagy is regulated by distinct mechanisms in different cell types, and these cell type-specific mechanisms underlie the differential vulnerability of separate tissues to autophagy mutations, resulting in heterogeneous manifestations of disease.

    “Furthermore, mounting evidence shows that autophagy is regulated by distinct mechanisms in different cell types [11–26], and these cell type-specific mechanisms underlie the differential vulnerability of separate tissues to autophagy mutations, resulting in heterogenous manifestations of disease.”
  • With global expression of germline mutations associated with ALS, neural and non-neural tissues manifest the detrimental effects of compromised autophagy, but to varying extents.

    “with global expression of germline mutations associated with ALS, neural and non-neural tissues manifest the detrimental effects of compromised autophagy [11], but to varying extents [365,366]”
  • Differences in autophagy between neurons and astrocytes may be due to enhanced phosphorylation of astrocytic SPHK1/SK1 with starvation, whereas benzoxazines activate neuronal but not astrocytic SPHK1 to induce autophagy.

    “These differences in autophagy may be due to enhanced phosphorylation of astrocytic SPHK1/SK1 (sphingosine kinase 1) with starvation, whereas benzoxazines activate neuronal (but not astrocytic) SPHK1 to induce autophagy [11].”
  • MTOR-independent activation of autophagy with benzoxazines takes place in neurons but not astrocytes.

    “whereas MTOR-independent activation of autophagy with benzoxazines (e.g., 10-NCP and fluphenazine) takes place in neurons but not astrocytes [11].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 36

Authors
Moruno-Manchon, J. F., Uzor, N.-E., Ambati, C. R., Shetty, V., Putluri, N., Jagannath, C., McCullough, L. D., & Tsvetkov, A. S.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Tsvetkov, Andrey S.
Venue
Cell Death & Disease
Published
2018-05-09
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
521-521
ISSN
2041-4889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801699830
Cited by
36
References
77
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Death and Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hereditary Disease Foundation
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (NCI-CA125123, P30CA125123, RP170005, CA125123)
  • Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine (P30 CA125123, CA125123)
  • National Institutes of Health (RP170005, NCI-CA125123, CA125123)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA220297, NCI-CA125123, CA125123, P30CA125123)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Keywords
sphingosine kinase 1, autophagy, neurons, astrocytes, sphingosine-1-phosphate, neuroprotection, starvation, mutant huntingtin, Huntington's disease, neurotoxicity
MeSH terms
Sphingosine Kinase, Animals, Astrocytes, Autophagy, Neurons, Organ Specificity, Phosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor), Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review