Cited by 22Biochemical and Structural CharacterizationProtein Structure and DynamicsGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Designed allosteric protein logic

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The regulation of protein function by external or internal signals is one of the key features of living organisms. The ability to directly control the function of a selected protein would represent a valuable tool for regulating biological processes. Here, we present a generally applicable regulation of proteins called INSRTR, based on inserting a peptide into a loop of a target protein that retains its function. We demonstrate the versatility and robustness of coiled-coil-mediated regulation, which enables designs for either inactivation or activation of selected protein functions, and implementation of two-input logic functions with rapid response in mammalian cells. The selection of insertion positions in tested proteins was facilitated by using a predictive machine learning model. We showcase the robustness of the INSRTR strategy on proteins with diverse folds and biological functions, including enzymes, signaling mediators, DNA binders, transcriptional regulators, reporters, and antibody domains implemented as chimeric antigen receptors in T cells. Our findings highlight the potential of INSRTR as a powerful tool for precise control of protein function, advancing our understanding of biological processes and developing biotechnological and therapeutic interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41421-023-00635-y

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Plaper, T., Merljak, E., Fink, T., Satler, T., Ljubetič, A., Lainšček, D., Jazbec, V., Benčina, M., Stevanoska, S., Džeroski, S., & Jerala, R.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Chemistry (SI)
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
  • Jožef Stefan Institute (SI)
Corresponding author
Jerala, Roman
Venue
Cell Discovery
Published
2024-01-16
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
8-8
ISSN
2056-5968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390908261
Cited by
22
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Discovery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (P4-0167, J1-9173, N4-0080, N7-0800, Z4-2657, J1-4406)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
peptide insertion, protein inactivation, protein activation, chimeric antigen receptor, transcription factors, synthetic biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review