The economic burden of inherited retinal disease in Singapore: a prevalence-based cost-of-illness study
Open accessAbstract
Objective To assess the economic impact of inherited retinal disease (IRD) among Singaporeans.Methods IRD prevalence was calculated using population-based data. Focused surveys were conducted for sequentially enrolled IRD patients from a tertiary hospital. The IRD cohort was compared to the age- and gender-matched general population. Economic costs were expanded to the national IRD population to estimate productivity and healthcare costs.Results National IRD caseload was 5202 cases (95% CI, 1734-11273). IRD patients (n = 95) had similar employment rates to the general population (67.4% vs. 70.7%; p = 0.479). Annual income was lower among IRD patients than the general population (SGD 19,500 vs. 27,161; p < 0.0001). Employed IRD patients had lower median income than the general population (SGD 39,000 vs. 52,650; p < 0.0001). Per capita cost of IRD was SGD 9382, with a national burden of SGD 48.8 million per year. Male gender (beta of SGD 6543, p = 0.003) and earlier onset (beta of SGD 150/year, p = 0.009) predicted productivity loss. Treatment of the most economically impacted 10% of IRD patients with an effective IRD therapy required initial treatment cost of less than SGD 250,000 (USD 188,000) for cost savings to be achieved within 20 years.Conclusions Employment rates among Singaporean IRD patients were the same as the general population, but patient income was significantly lower. Economic losses were driven in part by male patients with early age of onset. Direct healthcare costs contributed relatively little to the financial burden.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other international studies suggested that 81% to 90% of the costs associated with IRDs are indirect and intangible.
“other international studies suggested that 81% to 90% of the costs associated with IRDs are indirect and intangible [80–84].”
From The economic impact of retinal diseases for which gene therapy is emerging: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as [80]
The Introduction reports that reduced wellbeing alone contributed more than 60% of the estimated IRD burden in the United States and Canada. The Results report that lost productivity accounted for 87.9% of losses in Singapore. Neither passage establishes that international studies put the combined indirect and intangible share at 81%–90%; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 15
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1977.
- Authors
- Chay, J., Tang, R. W. C., Tan, T.-E., Chan, C. M., Mathur, R., Lee, B. J. H., Chan, H. H., Sim, S. S. K. P., Farooqui, S., Teo, K. Y. C., Fenwick, E. K., Lamoureux, E. L., Cheung, C. M. G., & Fenner, B. J.
- Affiliations
- Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
- Singapore Eye Research Institute (SG)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Singapore National Eye Center (SG)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fenner, Beau J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Eye
- Published
- 2023-06-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3827-3833
- ISSN
- 0078-5334 (ISSN-L)
- 0950-222X
- 1476-5454
- PMC
- PMC10698171
- OpenAlex
- W4380033683
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Eye (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- SingHealth Foundation (SHF-SNEC 0920-4)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Keywords
- inherited retinal disease, economic burden, productivity loss, employment rate, patient income, health care costs, disease prevalence, age of onset, gender differences, Singapore
- MeSH terms
- Financial Stress, Humans, Male, Retinal Diseases, Singapore, Prevalence, Health Care Costs, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review