Clinical outcomes of a genomic screening program for actionable genetic conditions
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Three genetic conditions-hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, Lynch syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia-have tier 1 evidence for interventions that reduce morbidity and mortality, prompting proposals to screen unselected populations for these conditions. We examined the impact of genomic screening on risk management and early detection in an unselected population. METHODS: Observational study of electronic health records (EHR) among individuals in whom a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in a tier 1 gene was discovered through Geisinger's MyCode project. EHR of all eligible participants was evaluated for a prior genetic diagnosis and, among participants without such a diagnosis, relevant personal/family history, postdisclosure clinical diagnoses, and postdisclosure risk management. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of participants (305/351) did not have a prior genetic diagnosis of their tier 1 result. Of these, 65% had EHR evidence of relevant personal and/or family history of disease. Of 255 individuals eligible to have risk management, 70% (n = 179) had a recommended risk management procedure after results disclosure. Thirteen percent of participants (41/305) received a relevant clinical diagnosis after results disclosure. CONCLUSION: Genomic screening programs can identify previously unrecognized individuals at increased risk of cancer and heart disease and facilitate risk management and early cancer detection.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., et al. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30 · Cited by 32,594 · see citing works
Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Screening, diagnosis and management of pediatric and adult patients
Goldberg, A. C., Hopkins, P. N., Toth, P. P., Ballantyne, C. M., Rader, D. J., Robinson, J. G., Daniels, S. R., Gidding, S. S., de Ferranti, S. D., Ito, M. K., et al. (2011) · Journal of clinical lipidology · doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2011.03.001 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: 2020 Summative Review
Kenner, B., Chari, S. T., Kelsen, D., Klimstra, D. S., Pandol, S. J., Rosenthal, M., Rustgi, A. K., Taylor, J. A., Yala, A., Abul-Husn, N., et al. (2021) · Pancreas · doi:10.1097/mpa.0000000000001762 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
- Authors
- Buchanan, A. H., Lester Kirchner, H., Schwartz, M. L. B., Kelly, M. A., Schmidlen, T., Jones, L. K., Hallquist, M. L. G., Rocha, H., Betts, M., Schwiter, R., Butry, L., Lazzeri, A. L., Frisbie, L. R., Rahm, A. K., Hao, J., Willard, H. F., Martin, C. L., Ledbetter, D. H., Williams, M. S., & Sturm, A. C.
- Affiliations
- Geisinger Health System (US)
- Geisinger Medical Center (US)
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Buchanan, Adam H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genetics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1874-1882
- ISSN
- 1098-3600 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7605431
- OpenAlex
- W3037727765
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genetics in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Keywords
- genomic screening, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, familial hypercholesterolemia, pathogenic variants, risk management, early cancer detection, genetic disclosure, electronic health records
- MeSH terms
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genomics, Early Detection of Cancer, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review