The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving accuracies of genomic predictions for drought tolerance in maize by joint modeling of additive and dominance effects in multi-environment trials
Open accessAbstract
Breeding for drought tolerance is a challenging task that requires costly, extensive, and precise phenotyping. Genomic selection (GS) can be used to maximize selection efficiency and the genetic gains in maize (Zea mays L.) breeding programs for drought tolerance. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of genomic selection (GS) using additive (A) and additive + dominance (AD) models to predict the performance of untested maize single-cross hybrids for drought tolerance in multi-environment trials. Phenotypic data of five drought tolerance traits were measured in 308 hybrids along eight trials under water-stressed (WS) and well-watered (WW) conditions over two years and two locations in Brazil. Hybrids' genotypes were inferred based on their parents' genotypes (inbred lines) using single-nucleotide polymorphism markers obtained via genotyping-by-sequencing. GS analyses were performed using genomic best linear unbiased prediction by fitting a factor analytic (FA) multiplicative mixed model. Two cross-validation (CV) schemes were tested: CV1 and CV2. The FA framework allowed for investigating the stability of additive and dominance effects across environments, as well as the additive-by-environment and the dominance-by-environment interactions, with interesting applications for parental and hybrid selection. Results showed differences in the predictive accuracy between A and AD models, using both CV1 and CV2, for the five traits in both water conditions. For grain yield (GY) under WS and using CV1, the AD model doubled the predictive accuracy in comparison to the A model. Through CV2, GS models benefit from borrowing information of correlated trials, resulting in an increase of 40% and 9% in the predictive accuracy of GY under WS for A and AD models, respectively. These results highlight the importance of multi-environment trial analyses using GS models that incorporate additive and dominance effects for genomic predictions of GY under drought in maize single-cross hybrids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As reported in other studies in plants, the inclusion of dominance effects in traditional WGP–MET resulted in increased predictive accuracy in models based on GBLUP compared with other methods.”
From Nonlinear kernels, dominance, and envirotyping data increase the accuracy of genome-based prediction in multi-environment trials (2021) · cites this paper as Dias et al. (2018)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Dias et al. (2018) demonstrated that GBLUP models containing A+D effects doubled the predictive capacity for grain yield in maize under diverse environmental conditions, such as environments with limited water availability (i.e., drought-stress screening trials).”
From Nonlinear kernels, dominance, and envirotyping data increase the accuracy of genome-based prediction in multi-environment trials (2021) · cites this paper as Dias et al. (2018)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · Cited by 7,917
A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species
Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., & Mitchell, S. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019379 · Cited by 6,461
Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions
VanRaden, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980 · Cited by 6,050
Maroof, M. A. S., Soliman, K. M., Jorgensen, R. A., & Allard, R. W. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014 · Cited by 5,132
Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height
Yang, J., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B. P., Gordon, S., Henders, A. K., Nyholt, D. R., Madden, P. A., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., Montgomery, G. W., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.608 · Cited by 4,446
TASSEL-GBS: A High Capacity Genotyping by Sequencing Analysis Pipeline
Glaubitz, J. C., Casstevens, T. M., Lü, F., Harriman, J., Elshire, R. J., Sun, Q., & Buckler, E. S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090346 · Cited by 1,686
Data and Theory Point to Mainly Additive Genetic Variance for Complex Traits
Hill, W. G., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000008 · Cited by 1,039
Gilmour, A. R., Thompson, R., & Cullis, B. R. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533274 · Cited by 915
BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing
Piepho, H., Möhring, J., Melchinger, A. E., & Büchse, A. (2007) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9449-8 · Cited by 872
Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: A Comparison of Models
Heslot, N., Yang, H., Sorrells, M. E., & Jannink, J. (2011) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0297 · Cited by 732
Burgueño, J. A., Campos, G. D. L., WEIGEL, K. A., & Crossa, J. L. (2012) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0299 · Cited by 624
Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era
Tuberosa, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00347 · Cited by 582
Smith, A., Cullis, B., & Thompson, R. (2001) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01138.x · Cited by 566
Accuracy of Genomic Selection Methods in a Standard Data Set of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taedaL.)
Resende, M. F. R., Muńoz, P., de Resende, M. D. V., Garrick, D. J., Fernando, R. L., Davis, J. M., Jokela, E. J., Martin, T. A., Peter, G. F., & Kirst, M. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.137026 · Cited by 430
Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn-belt: discovery to product
Cooper, M., Gho, C., Leafgren, R., Tang, T., & Messina, C. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru064 · Cited by 417
Heslot, N., Akdemir, D., Sorrells, M. E., & Jannink, J.-L. (2014) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-013-2231-5 · Cited by 409
Vitezica, Z. G., Varona, L., & Legarra, A. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.113.155176 · Cited by 400
Prediction of Maize Single‐Cross Performance Using RFLPs and Information from Related Hybrids
Bernardo, R. (1994) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183x003400010003x · Cited by 379
Lopez-Cruz, M. A., Crossa, J. L., Bonnett, D. G., Dreisigacker, S., Poland, J., Jannink, J., Singh, R. P., Autrique, E., & Campos, G. D. L. (2015) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.114.016097 · Cited by 340
Beyene, Y., Semagn, K., Mugo, S., Tarekegne, A., Babu, R., Meisel, B., Sehabiague, P., Makumbi, D., Magorokosho, C., Oikeh, S. O., et al. (2014) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2014.07.0460 · Cited by 302
Technow, F., Schrag, T. A., Schipprack, W., Bauer, E., Simianer, H., & Melchinger, A. E. (2014) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.165860 · Cited by 237
Analyzing genotype-environment data by mixed models with multiplicative terms
Piepho, H.-P. (1997) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533976 · Cited by 234
Comparison of Weighting in Two‐Stage Analysis of Plant Breeding Trials
Möhring, J., & Piepho, H. (2009) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2009.02.0083 · Cited by 228
Dominance Genetic Variation Contributes Little to the Missing Heritability for Human Complex Traits
Zhu, Z., Bakshi, A., Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., Hemani, G., Lee, S. H., Nolte, I. M., van Vliet-Ostaptchouk, J. V., Snieder, H., Esko, T., Milani, L., et al. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.01.001 · Cited by 224
Zhang, X., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Semagn, K., Beyene, Y., Babu, R., López-Cruz, M. A., San Vicente, F., Olsen, M., Buckler, E., Jannink, J.-L., et al. (2015) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2014.99 · Cited by 212
Wolak, M. E. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00213.x · Cited by 204
Piepho, H.-P. (1998) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s001220050885 · Cited by 198
Unraveling Additive from Nonadditive Effects Using Genomic Relationship Matrices
Muńoz, P., Resende, M. F. R., Gezan, S. A., de Resende, M. D. V., Campos, G. D. L., Kirst, M., Huber, D. A., & Peter, G. F. (2014) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.171322 · Cited by 194
Self-citationKelly, A. M., Smith, A. B., Eccleston, J. A., & Cullis, B. R. (2007) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.08.0540 · Cited by 185
Ribaut, J., Betrán, J., Monneveux, P., & Setter, T. L. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79418-1_16 · Cited by 182
Technow, F., Riedelsheimer, C., Schrag, T. A., & Melchinger, A. E. (2012) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-012-1905-8 · Cited by 182
Leida, C., Moser, C., Esteras, C., Ronan Sulpice, A., Lunn, J. E., de Langen, F., Monforte, A. J., & Belén Picó, M. (2015) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12863-015-0183-2 · Cited by 181
Smith, A. B., Ganesalingam, A., Kuchel, H., & Cullis, B. R. (2015) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-014-2412-x · Cited by 172
A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection
Toro, M. Á., & Varona, L. (2010) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-42-33 · Cited by 169
Factor-analytic models for genotype × environment type problems and structured covariance matrices
Meyer, K. (2009) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-41-21 · Cited by 166
Mutation and Evolutionary Rates in Adélie Penguins from the Antarctic
Millar, C. D., Dodd, A. W., Anderson, J., Gibb, G. C., Ritchie, P. A., Baroni, C. D., Woodhams, M. D., Hendy, M. D., & Lambert, D. M. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000209 · Cited by 163
Tingley, R., & Shine, R. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025979 · Cited by 162
Haplotype Mapping of a Diploid Non-Meiotic Organism Using Existing and Induced Aneuploidies
Legrand, M., Forche, A., Selmecki, A. M., Chan, C., Kirkpatrick, D. T., & Berman, J. G. (2007) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0040001 · Cited by 153
Genomic Prediction of Single Crosses in the Early Stages of a Maize Hybrid Breeding Pipeline
Kadam, D. C., Potts, S. M., Bohn, M., Lipka, A. E., & Lorenz, A. J. (2016) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.116.031286 · Cited by 135
GSE is now an open access journal published by BioMed Central
Hayes, H., Baret, P. V., & Boichard, D. (2009) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-41-1 · Cited by 133
de Maturana, E. L., Campos, G. D. L., Wu, X., Daniel Gianola, B., WEIGEL, K. A., & Rosa, G. J. M. (2010) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-42-1 · Cited by 130
Drought Tolerance in Maize: Indirect Selection through Secondary Traits versus Genomewide Selection
Ziyomo, C., & Bernardo, R. (2013) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2012.11.0651 · Cited by 124
Burgueño, J. A., Crossa, J. L., Cornelius, P. L., & Yang, R. (2008) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.11.0632 · Cited by 118
Prediction Assessment of Linear Mixed Models for Multienvironment Trials
Burgueño, J. A., Crossa, J. L., Torres, J. M. C., Vicente, F. S., & Das, B. (2011) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2010.07.0403 · Cited by 105
Specification of floral organs in Arabidopsis
Wellmer, F., Graciet, E., & Riechmann, J. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ert385 · Cited by 103
Cullis, B. R., Jefferson, P., Thompson, R., & Smith, A. B. (2014) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-014-2373-0 · Cited by 102
Roberts, A., McMillan, L., Wang, W. W., Parker, J. S., Rusyn, I., & Threadgill, D. W. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm220 · Cited by 102
Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials
Oakey, H., Cullis, B. R., Thompson, R., Comadran, J., Halpin, C., & Waugh, R. (2016) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.116.027524 · Cited by 93
Joint modeling of additive and non-additive (genetic line) effects in multi-environment trials
Oakey, H., Verbyla, A. P., Cullis, B. R., Wei, X., & Pitchford, W. S. (2007) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-007-0515-3 · Cited by 88
The contribution of dominance to phenotype prediction in a pine breeding and simulated population
de Almeida Filho, J. E., Guimarães, J. F. R., e Silva, F. F., de Resende, M. D. V., Muñoz, P., Kirst, M., & Resende, M. F. R. (2016) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2016.23 · Cited by 84
Breeding for Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)
Maazou, A. S., Tu, J., Qiu, J., & Liu, Z. (2016) · American Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.4236/ajps.2016.714172 · Cited by 79
Bouvet, J. M., Makouanzi, G., Cros, D., & Vigneron, P. (2015) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2015.78 · Cited by 78
Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models
Azevedo, C. F., de Resende, M. D. V., e Silva, F. F., Viana, J. M. S., Valente, M. S. F., Resende, M. F. R., & Muñoz, P. (2015) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12863-015-0264-2 · Cited by 71
Bernardo, R. (1996) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00230131 · Cited by 64
Kumar, S., Molloy, C., Muńoz, P., Daetwyler, H. D., Chagné, D., & Volz, R. K. (2015) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.115.021105 · Cited by 51
Inclusion of Dominance Effects in the Multivariate GBLUP Model
dos Santos, J. P. R., Vasconcellos, R. C. D. C., Pires, L. P. M., Balestre, M., & Pinho, R. G. V. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152045 · Cited by 51
Estimation in a multiplicative mixed model involving a genetic relationship matrix
Kelly, A. M., Cullis, B. R., Gilmour, A. R., Eccleston, J. A., & Thompson, R. (2009) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-41-33 · Cited by 45
A Mechanism for Fair Distribution of Resources without Payments
Christoforou, E., Anta, A. F., & Santos, A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155962 · Cited by 39
Multiple endosymbiont infections and reproductive manipulations in a linyphiid spider population
Curry, M. M., Paliulis, L. V., Welch, K. D., Harwood, J. D., & White, J. A. (2015) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2015.2 · Cited by 33
GenoMatrix: A Software Package for Pedigree-Based and Genomic Prediction Analyses on Complex Traits
Nazarian, A., & Gezan, S. A. (2016) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esw020 · Cited by 33
Self-citationKrchov, L., & Bernardo, R. (2015) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0064 · Cited by 31
Nazarian, A., & Gezan, S. A. (2015) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esv096 · Cited by 14
Self-citationRatzel, S., & Cullinan, S. B. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.12.008 · Cited by 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rani, A., Devi, P., Jha, U. C., Sharma, K. D., Siddique, K. H. M., & Nayyar, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01759 · Cited by 239
Heritability in Plant Breeding on a Genotype-Difference Basis
Schmidt, P., Hartung, J., Bennewitz, J., & Piepho, H. (2019) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.119.302134 · Cited by 220
Costa-Neto, G., Fritsche-Neto, R., & Crossa, J. (2021) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-020-00353-1 · Cited by 153
Oliveira, I. C. M., Guilhen, J. H. S., Ribeiro, P. C. D. O., Gezan, S. A., Schaffert, R. E., Simeone, M. L. F., Damasceno, C. M. B., Carneiro, J. E. D. S., Carneiro, P. C. S., Parrella, R. A. D. C., et al. (2020) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107929 · Cited by 78
Self-citationCrossa, J. L., Montesinos-López, O. A., Pérez‐Rodríguez, P., Costa‐Neto, G., Fritsche‐Neto, R., Ortiz, R. O., Martini, J. W. R., Lillemo, M., Montesinos‐López, A., Jarquín, D., et al. (2022) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_9 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Dias, K. O. D. G., Gezan, S. A., Guimarães, C. T., Nazarian, A., da Costa e Silva, L., Parentoni, S. N., de Oliveira Guimarães, P. E., de Oliveira Anoni, C., Pádua, J. M. V., de Oliveira Pinto, M., Noda, R. W., Ribeiro, C. A. G., de Magalhães, J. V., Garcia, A. A. F., de Souza, J. C., Guimarães, L. J. M., & Pastina, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR)
- University of Florida (US)
- Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Heredity
- Published
- 2018-02-23
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-37
- ISSN
- 0018-067X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2540
- PMC
- PMC5997769
- OpenAlex
- W2792329433
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Heredity (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2016/12977‐7)
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (23038, program PREMIO 2045/2014)
- Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- genomic selection, drought tolerance, maize, additive and dominance effects, multi-environment trials, prediction accuracy, single-cross hybrids, cross-validation, gene-environment interaction, SNP markers, genotyping-by-sequencing
- MeSH terms
- Plant Breeding, Adaptation, Biological, Algorithms, Environment, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Stress, Physiological, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Plant, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Droughts, Gene-Environment Interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
