The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning
Open accessAbstract
Ecosystems services (ES) assessment is a significant scientific topic recognized for its potential to address sustainability issues. However, there is an absence of science–policy frameworks in land use planning that lead to the ES science being used in policy. China’s Ecological Redline Policy (ERP) is one of the first national policies utilizing multiple ES, but there is no standardized approach for working across the science–policy interface. We propose a transdisciplinary framework to determine ecological redline areas (ERAs) in Shanghai using: ES, biodiversity and ecologically fragile hotspots, landscape structure, and stakeholder opinions. We determine the five criteria to identify ERAs for Shanghai using multi-temporal, high resolution images (0.5 m) and biophysical models. We examine ERP effectiveness by comparing land use scenarios for 2040. Compared to alternative land uses, ES increase significantly under the ERP. The inclusion of ES in spatial planning led stakeholders to increase terrestrial habitat protection by 174% in Shanghai. Our analysis suggests that strategic planning for ES could reduce tradeoffs between environmental quality and development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
(2012) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/09504121211205250 · Cited by 4,477
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 · Cited by 3,464
The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people
Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., et al. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002 · Cited by 2,617
Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K. M., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., et al. (2009) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/080023 · Cited by 2,389
Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R. S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808772106 · Cited by 2,257
Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver
Salzman, J., Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., & Shallenberger, R. J. (2009) · Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University) · Cited by 1,990
Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital
Ouyang, Z., Zheng, H., Xiao, Y., Polasky, S., Liu, J., Xu, W., Wang, Q., Zhang, L., Xiao, Y., Rao, E., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf2295 · Cited by 1,744
Self-citation14. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Tetzlaff, K. (2010) · Yearbook of International Environmental Law · doi:10.1093/yiel/yvs040 · Cited by 1,589
The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010) · Ecosystem Ecology · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750458.007 · Cited by 1,514
Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
Chan, K. M. A., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B. S., et al. (2012) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7 · Cited by 1,057
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, Y., Wong, C. P., Jiang, B., Hughes, A. C., Wang, M., & Wang, Q.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2018-08-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3034-3034
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883013245
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 18.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-018-05306-1
- The paper
- Bai, Y., Wong, C. P., Jiang, B., Hughes, A. C., Wang, M., & Wang, Q. (2018). Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05306-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
