Cited by 259CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy researchCAR-T cell therapy research

Cas9 immunity creates challenges for CRISPR gene editing therapies

Open access
Crudele, Julie M., Chamberlain, Jeffrey S.·2018·Nature Communications

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 is a genome-editing technology1,2 that utilizes archaeal and bacterial Cas9 nucleases to introduce double-stranded breaks in DNA at targeted sites. These breaks can be used to remove, replace, or add pieces of DNA. While not the first genome editor, CRISPR-Cas9 is efficient and cost-effective because cutting is guided by a strand of RNA rather than a protein. The potential uses in health care are plentiful, from disrupting dominant genes that cause cancer3 to repairing mutated genes that cause genetic diseases, such as muscular dystrophy4. Therapeutic approaches based on this technology fill the preclinical pipeline, and rely on the use of viral vectors to deliver the Cas9 gene and guide RNA to a gene of interest. However, concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 use in gene therapy remain. A pre-print released prior to peer review has recently underlined the question of whether immunological responses to Cas9 may negatively impact its clinical use5. Here we discuss the implications of this finding for the application of CRISPR/Cas in gene therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-05843-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preexisting T-cell populations may represent a greater risk to gene-edited systemic tissues than antibodies at any prevalence or concentration.

    “preexisting T-cell populations may represent a greater risk to gene-edited systemic tissues than antibodies at any prevalence or concentration4–6.”

    From Investigation of Cas9 Antibodies in the Human Eye (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

  • Preexisting immunity indicates that Cas9 protein expressed by edited cells may lead to immunological activation, inflammation, and potentially killing of edited cells.

    “This preexisting immunity indicates that Cas9 protein expressed by edited cells may lead to immunological activation, inflammation, and potentially killing of edited cells—as has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo4–6.”

    From Investigation of Cas9 Antibodies in the Human Eye (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 259

Authors
Crudele, J. M., & Chamberlain, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Chamberlain, Jeffrey S.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-08-29
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
3497-3497
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888449128
Cited by
259
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 5
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (AR44533)
  • Muscular Dystrophy Association (409968)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, gene therapy, genome editing, viral vectors, guide RNA, off-target effects
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, RNA, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Genetic Therapy, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review