Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local mutational diversity drives intratumoral immune heterogeneity in non-small cell lung cancer

Open access
Jia, Qingzhu, Wu, Wei, Wang, Yuqi, Alexander, Peter B., Sun, Chengdu, Gong, Zhihua, Cheng, Jia-Nan, Sun, Huaibo, Guan, Yanfang, Xia, Xuefeng, Yang, Ling, Yi, Xin, Wan, Yisong Y., Wang, Haidong, He, Ji, Futreal, P. Andrew, Li, Qi-Jing, Zhu, Bo·2018·Nature Communications

Abstract

Combining whole exome sequencing, transcriptome profiling, and T cell repertoire analysis, we investigate the spatial features of surgically-removed biopsies from multiple loci in tumor masses of 15 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This revealed that the immune microenvironment has high spatial heterogeneity such that intratumoral regional variation is as large as inter-personal variation. While the local total mutational burden (TMB) is associated with local T-cell clonal expansion, local anti-tumor cytotoxicity does not directly correlate with neoantigen abundance. Together, these findings caution against that immunological signatures can be predicted solely from TMB or microenvironmental analysis from a single locus biopsy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-07767-w

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Jia, Q., Wu, W., Wang, Y., Alexander, P. B., Sun, C., Gong, Z., Cheng, J.-N., Sun, H., Guan, Y., Xia, X., Yang, L., Yi, X., Wan, Y. Y., Wang, H., He, J., Futreal, P. A., Li, Q.-J., & Zhu, B.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-12-18
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
5361-5361
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905562353
Cited by
489
References
20
FWCI
12.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.