Quantification of frequency-dependent genetic architectures in 25 UK Biobank traits reveals action of negative selection
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Understanding the role of rare variants is important in elucidating the genetic basis of human disease. Negative selection can cause rare variants to have larger per-allele effect sizes than common variants. Here, we develop a method to estimate the minor allele frequency (MAF) dependence of SNP effect sizes. We use a model in which per-allele effect sizes have variance proportional to [ p (1 − p )] α , where p is the MAF and negative values of α imply larger effect sizes for rare variants. We estimate α for 25 UK Biobank diseases and complex traits. All traits produce negative α estimates, with best-fit mean of –0.38 (s.e. 0.02) across traits. Despite larger rare variant effect sizes, rare variants (MAF < 1%) explain less than 10% of total SNP-heritability for most traits analyzed. Using evolutionary modeling and forward simulations, we validate the α model of MAF-dependent trait effects and assess plausible values of relevant evolutionary parameters.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 157
- Authors
- Schoech, A. P., Jordan, D. M., Loh, P.-R., Gazal, S., O’Connor, L. J., Balick, D. J., Palamara, P. F., Finucane, H. K., Sunyaev, S. R., & Price, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Schoech, Armin P.
- Price, Alkes L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2019-02-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 790-790
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6377669
- OpenAlex
- W2914532656
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
- National Institutes of Health (16549, MH101244, HG009088)
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH101244)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG009088, T32HG002295)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- negative selection, rare variants, minor allele frequency, SNP heritability, complex traits, evolutionary modeling, forward modeling, UK Biobank
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Alleles, Gene Frequency, Genotype, United Kingdom, Humans, Models, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Biological Specimen Banks, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review