Cited by 14Protein Structure and DynamicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Learning dynamical information from static protein and sequencing data

Open access
Pearce, Philip, Woodhouse, Francis G., Forrow, Aden, Kelly, Ashley, Kusumaatmaja, Halim, Dunkel, Jörn·2019·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Many complex processes, from protein folding to neuronal network dynamics, can be described as stochastic exploration of a high-dimensional energy landscape. Although efficient algorithms for cluster detection in high-dimensional spaces have been developed over the last two decades, considerably less is known about the reliable inference of state transition dynamics in such settings. Here we introduce a flexible and robust numerical framework to infer Markovian transition networks directly from time-independent data sampled from stationary equilibrium distributions. We demonstrate the practical potential of the inference scheme by reconstructing the network dynamics for several protein-folding transitions, gene-regulatory network motifs, and HIV evolution pathways. The predicted network topologies and relative transition time scales agree well with direct estimates from time-dependent molecular dynamics data, stochastic simulations, and phylogenetic trees, respectively. Owing to its generic structure, the framework introduced here will be applicable to high-throughput RNA and protein-sequencing datasets, and future cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-13307-x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearce, P., Woodhouse, F. G., Forrow, A., Kelly, A., Kusumaatmaja, H., & Dunkel, J.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Kusumaatmaja, Halim
  • Dunkel, Jörn
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-11-26
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
5368-5368
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991509871
Cited by
14
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Royal Society (IE160909)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
state transition dynamics, energy landscape, protein folding, HIV evolution, high-dimensional data clustering, RNA sequencing data, network topology reconstruction
MeSH terms
HIV, Markov Chains, Proteins, Protein Folding, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Gene Regulatory Networks, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review