Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fast sulfate formation from oxidation of SO2 by NO2 and HONO observed in Beijing haze

Open access
Wang, Junfeng, Li, Jingyi, Ye, Jianhuai, Zhao, Jian, Wu, Yangzhou, Hu, Jianlin, Liu, Dantong, Nie, Dongyang, Shen, Fuzhen, Huang, Xiangpeng, Huang, Dan Dan, Ji, Dongsheng, Sun, Xu, Xu, Weiqi, Guo, Jianping, Song, Shaojie, Qin, Yiming, Liu, Pengfei, Turner, Jay R., Lee, Hyun Chul, Hwang, Sungwoo, Liao, Hong, Martin, Scot T., Zhang, Qi, Chen, Mindong, Sun, Yele, Ge, Xinlei, Jacob, Daniel J.·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Severe events of wintertime particulate air pollution in Beijing (winter haze) are associated with high relative humidity (RH) and fast production of particulate sulfate from the oxidation of sulfur dioxide (SO 2) emitted by coal combustion. There has been considerable debate regarding the mechanism for SO 2 oxidation. Here we show evidence from field observations of a haze event that rapid oxidation of SO 2 by nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) and nitrous acid (HONO) takes place, the latter producing nitrous oxide (N 2 O). Sulfate shifts to larger particle sizes during the event, indicative of fog/cloud processing. Fog and cloud readily form under winter haze conditions, leading to high liquid water contents with high pH (>5.5) from elevated ammonia. Such conditions enable fast aqueous-phase oxidation of SO 2 by NO 2, producing HONO which can in turn oxidize SO 2 to yield N 2 O.This mechanism could provide an explanation for sulfate formation under some winter haze conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-16683-x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Wang, J., Li, J., Ye, J., Zhao, J., Wu, Y., Hu, J., Liu, D., Nie, D., Shen, F., Huang, X., Huang, D. D., Ji, D., Sun, X., Xu, W., Guo, J., Song, S., Qin, Y., Liu, P., Turner, J. R., Lee, H. C., Hwang, S., Liao, H., Martin, S. T., Zhang, Q., Chen, M., Sun, Y., Ge, X., & Jacob, D. J.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-06-05
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
2844-2844
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033223258
Cited by
357
References
51
FWCI
18.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast sulfate formation from oxidation of SO2 by NO2 and HONO observed in Beijing haze. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-020-16683-x
The paper
Wang, J., Li, J., Ye, J., Zhao, J., Wu, Y., Hu, J., Liu, D., Nie, D., Shen, F., Huang, X., Huang, D. D., Ji, D., Sun, X., Xu, W., Guo, J., Song, S., Qin, Y., Liu, P., Turner, J. R., . . . Jacob, D. J. (2020). Fast sulfate formation from oxidation of SO2 by NO2 and HONO observed in Beijing haze. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16683-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.