Cited by 132Protein Degradation and InhibitorsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

A potent KRAS macromolecule degrader specifically targeting tumours with mutant KRAS

Open access
Bery, Nicolas, Miller, Ami, Rabbitts, Terry·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Tumour-associated KRAS mutations are the most prevalent in the three RAS-family isoforms and involve many different amino-acids. Therefore, molecules able to interfere with mutant KRAS protein are potentially important for wide-ranging tumour therapy. We describe the engineering of two RAS degraders based on protein macromolecules (macrodrugs) fused to specific E3 ligases. A KRAS-specific DARPin fused to the VHL E3 ligase is compared to a pan-RAS intracellular single domain antibody (iDAb) fused to the UBOX domain of the CHIP E3 ligase. We demonstrate that while the KRAS-specific DARPin degrader induces specific proteolysis of both mutant and wild type KRAS, it only inhibits proliferation of cancer cells expressing mutant KRAS in vitro and in vivo. Pan-RAS protein degradation, however, affects proliferation irrespective of the RAS mutation. These data show that specific KRAS degradation is an important therapeutic strategy to affect tumours expressing any of the range of KRAS mutations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-17022-w

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 132

Authors
Bery, N., Miller, A., & Rabbitts, T.
Affiliations
Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-06-26
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
3233-3233
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037152991
Cited by
132
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Bloodwise (12051)
  • Wellcome Trust (099246/Z/12/Z)
  • RCUK | Medical Research Council (MR/J000612/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
KRAS mutation, protein degradation, DARPin, VHL E3 ubiquitin ligase, nanobodies, Ras family, tumour therapy, targeted protein degradation, tumor cell proliferation
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Animals, Humans, Mice, Nude, Mutation, Neoplasms, Protein Engineering, Signal Transduction, Apoptosis, ras Proteins, Cell Line, Tumor, Macromolecular Substances, Cell Proliferation, Mutant Proteins, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review