Cited by 89Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

An ecological framework to understand the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation

Open access
Xiao, Yandong, Angulo, Marco Tulio, Lao, Songyang, Weiss, Scott T., Liu, Yang-Yu·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Human gut microbiota plays critical roles in physiology and disease. Our understanding of ecological principles that govern the dynamics and resilience of this highly complex ecosystem remains rudimentary. This knowledge gap becomes more problematic as new approaches to modifying this ecosystem, such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), are being developed as therapeutic interventions. Here we present an ecological framework to understand the efficacy of FMT in treating conditions associated with a disrupted gut microbiota, using the recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection as a prototype disease. This framework predicts several key factors that determine the efficacy of FMT. Moreover, it offers an efficient algorithm for the rational design of personalized probiotic cocktails to decolonize pathogens. We analyze data from both preclinical mouse experiments and a clinical trial of FMT to validate our theoretical framework. The presented results significantly improve our understanding of the ecological principles of FMT and have a positive translational impact on the rational design of general microbiota-based therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-17180-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Xiao et al. found that the optimal donor was most personalized when the recipient had higher microbiome diversity before FMT.

    “Xiao et al. 145 assessed microbial dynamics in FMT using an ecological modeling framework (based on the generalized Lotka-Volterra model) and found that the optimal donor was most personalized when the recipient had higher microbiome diversity before FMT.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 104 · Cited by 89

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Aroniadis OC Brandt LJ Fecal microbiota transplantation: past, present and future Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2012 29 79 84 23041678

Authors
Xiao, Y., Angulo, M. T., Lao, S., Weiss, S. T., & Liu, Y.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (MX)
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Yang-Yu
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-07-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
3329-3329
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039446139
Cited by
89
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61902418)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01AI141529, R01HD093761, UH3OD023268, U19AI095219, U01HL089856)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
fecal microbiota transplantation, Clostridium difficile infection, recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, microbiota-based therapy, microbiome dynamics, ecological model
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Algorithms, Animals, Clostridium Infections, Feces, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Recurrence, Clostridioides difficile, Treatment Outcome, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review