Cited by 37Metabolism and Genetic DisordersGenomics and Rare DiseasesMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Rare genetic variants affecting urine metabolite levels link population variation to inborn errors of metabolism

Open access
Cheng, Yurong, Schlosser, Pascal, Hertel, Johannes, Sekula, Peggy, Oefner, Peter J., Spiekerkoetter, Ute, Mielke, Johanna, Freitag, Daniel F. +10 more·2021·Nature Communications

Abstract

Metabolite levels in urine may provide insights into genetic mechanisms shaping their related pathways. We therefore investigate the cumulative contribution of rare, exonic genetic variants on urine levels of 1487 metabolites and 53,714 metabolite ratios among 4864 GCKD study participants. Here we report the detection of 128 significant associations involving 30 unique genes, 16 of which are known to underlie inborn errors of metabolism. The 30 genes are strongly enriched for shared expression in liver and kidney (odds ratio = 65, p-FDR = 3e−7), with hepatocytes and proximal tubule cells as driving cell types. Use of UK Biobank whole-exome sequencing data links genes to diseases connected to the identified metabolites. In silico constraint-based modeling of gene knockouts in a virtual whole-body, organ-resolved metabolic human correctly predicts the observed direction of metabolite changes, highlighting the potential of linking population genetics to modeling. Our study implicates candidate variants and genes for inborn errors of metabolism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-20877-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 10 exome-wide significant genes identified by SCHEMA, two were prioritised candidates from fine-mapping: GRIN2A and SP4.

    “Of the 10 exome-wide significant genes identified by SCHEMA36, two were prioritised candidates from fine-mapping; GRIN2A encoding a glutamatergic NMDA receptor subunit, and SP4, a transcription factor highly expressed in brain and which is regulated by NMDA transmission, and also regulates NMDA receptor abundance37.”
  • The authors limited fine-mapping to regions that achieved genome-wide significance in the core PGC GWAS, since the method needs all markers in a region.

    “As fine-mapping requires data from all markers in the region36 we only performed fine-mapping on regions that attained genome-wide significance (GWS) in the core PGC GWAS.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 37

Authors
Cheng, Y., Schlosser, P., Hertel, J., Sekula, P., Oefner, P. J., Spiekerkoetter, U., Mielke, J., Freitag, D. F., Schmidts, M., GCKD Investigators, Oefner, P. J., Kronenberg, F., Eckardt, K.-U., Kronenberg, F., Eckardt, K.-U., Thiele, I., Li, Y., & Köttgen, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • Bayer (Germany) (DE)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Köttgen, Anna
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-02-11
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
964-964
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3127646790
Cited by
37
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg)
Funders
  • European Commission (757922, HORIZON2020)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KO 3598/4-1, KO 3598/5-1, 431984000, SFB1453, KO 3598/4-2, 716344, CRC992)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01ER0804, 431984000)
  • Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (431984000)
  • KfH-Stiftung Präventivmedizin
  • Medizinische Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
rare variants, urinary metabolites, metabolite ratios, inborn errors of metabolism, population variation, genetic association, hepatocytes, proximal tubular epithelial cells, constraint-based metabolic modeling, gene knockout, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Exome Sequencing, Genotype, Humans, Kidney, Liver, Male, Metabolism, Inborn Errors, Genetic Variation, Rare Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review