Cited by 32Semiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesStrong Light-Matter Interactions

Picosecond time-resolved photon antibunching measures nanoscale exciton motion and the true number of chromophores

Open access
Hedley, Gordon J., Schröder, Tim, Steiner, Florian, Eder, Theresa, Hofmann, Felix J., Bange, Sebastian, Laux, Dirk, Höger, Sigurd +3 more·2021·Nature Communications

Abstract

The particle-like nature of light becomes evident in the photon statistics of fluorescence from single quantum systems as photon antibunching. In multichromophoric systems, exciton diffusion and subsequent annihilation occurs. These processes also yield photon antibunching but cannot be interpreted reliably. Here we develop picosecond time-resolved antibunching to identify and decode such processes. We use this method to measure the true number of chromophores on well-defined multichromophoric DNA-origami structures, and precisely determine the distance-dependent rates of annihilation between excitons. Further, this allows us to measure exciton diffusion in mesoscopic H- and J-type conjugated-polymer aggregates. We distinguish between one-dimensional intra-chain and three-dimensional inter-chain exciton diffusion at different times after excitation and determine the disorder-dependent diffusion lengths. Our method provides a powerful lens through which excitons can be studied at the single-particle level, enabling the rational design of improved excitonic probes such as ultra-bright fluorescent nanoparticles and materials for optoelectronic devices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-21474-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depending on their aggregation states (i.e., J-, H-, or random aggregates), CP aggregates that contain tens of CP chains showed fluorescence emission from a different number of the chromophores, in some cases only from a few chromophores.

    “Depending on their aggregation states (i.e., J-, H-, or random aggregates), CP aggregates that contain tens of CP chains showed fluorescence emission from a different number of the chromophores, in some cases only from a few chromophores.165−167”

    From The Pursuit of Shortwave Infrared-Emitting Nanoparticles with Bright Fluorescence through Molecular Design and Excited-State Engineering of Molecular Aggregates (2022) · cites this paper as [167]

    In Results, under “Exciton diffusion in conjugated polymer aggregates” (page not provided), the paper compares H- and J-type aggregates and reports different time-dependent numbers of independently emitting chromophores. It reports about 54 chains per H-type aggregate but about 9 per J-type aggregate. It does not study a separate random-aggregate class or establish that aggregates containing tens of chains emitted from only a few chromophores. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 32

Authors
Hedley, G. J., Schröder, T., Steiner, F., Eder, T., Hofmann, F. J., Bange, S., Laux, D., Höger, S., Tinnefeld, P., Lupton, J. M., & Vogelsang, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Center for NanoScience (DE)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Hedley, Gordon J.
  • Vogelsang, Jan
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-02-26
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1327-1327
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087824261
Cited by
32
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission (314695032, HORIZON2020, 737089)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (390776260, 2089/1390776260, EXC‐2089, EXC 2089/1390776260, EXC 2089/1, project B03), 319559986, 314695032)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/V004921/1, EP/V048805/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
Keywords
photon antibunching, exciton diffusion, exciton-exciton annihilation, DNA origami

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review