Cited by 568Climate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change and GeoengineeringClimate variability and models

Net-zero emission targets for major emitting countries consistent with the Paris Agreement

Open access
van Soest, Heleen L., den Elzen, Michel G. J., van Vuuren, Detlef P.·2021·Nature Communications

Abstract

Over 100 countries have set or are considering net-zero emissions or neutrality targets. However, most of the information on emissions neutrality (such as timing) is provided for the global level. Here, we look at national-level neutrality-years based on globally cost-effective 1.5 °C and 2 °C scenarios from integrated assessment models. These results indicate that domestic net zero greenhouse gas and CO 2 emissions in Brazil and the USA are reached a decade earlier than the global average, and in India and Indonesia later than global average. These results depend on choices like the accounting of land-use emissions. The results also show that carbon storage and afforestation capacity, income, share of non-CO 2 emissions, and transport sector emissions affect the variance in projected phase-out years across countries. We further compare these results to an alternative approach, using equity-based rules to establish target years. These results can inform policymakers on net-zero targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-22294-x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methane is a potent greenhouse gas with far greater global warming potential than carbon dioxide.

    “Biogas production is crucial in this context, especially for efficiently mitigating methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas with far greater global warming potential than carbon dioxide [101,167].”

    From Anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste for biogas production and sustainable bioenergy recovery: a review (2024) · cites this paper as [167]

    The Results section (‘Breakdown of emissions in the phase-out year’; page unavailable) identifies methane (CH4) as a greenhouse gas, and ‘The influence of definitions’ discusses applying global warming potentials to CH4 and CO2. Neither passage states that methane’s global warming potential is far greater than CO2’s. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Biogas production is crucial for efficiently mitigating methane emissions.

    “Biogas production is crucial in this context, especially for efficiently mitigating methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas with far greater global warming potential than carbon dioxide [101,167].”

    From Anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste for biogas production and sustainable bioenergy recovery: a review (2024) · cites this paper as [167]

    The Results sections on emissions at phase-out and on definitions discuss methane emissions and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, respectively. Neither the supplied passages nor searches for biogas production and methane mitigation address whether producing biogas efficiently mitigates methane emissions. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [4]Höhne N Emissions: world has four times the work or one-third of the time Nature 2020 579 25 28 10.1038/d41586-020-00571-x 32132686 · DOI
  2. [6]Tanaka K O’Neill BC Paris agreement zero emissions goal is not always consistent with 2 °C and 1.5 °C temperature targets Nat. Clim. Change 2018 8 319 324 10.1038/s41558-018-0097-x · DOI
  3. [7]Fuglestvedt J Implications of possible interpretations of ‘greenhouse gas balance’ in the Paris Agreement Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018 376 1 17 PMC5897819 29610378
  4. [8]Allen MR New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants Nat. Clim. Change 2016 6 773 776 10.1038/nclimate2998 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [12]Messner S Schrattenholzer L MESSAGE-MACRO: linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively Energy 2000 25 267 282 10.1016/S0360-5442(99)00063-8 · DOI
  6. [14]Luderer, G. et al. Description of the Remind Model (Version 1.6), http://papers.ssrn.com/Generic=2697070 (SSRN, 2015).
  7. [17]Grassi G The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation Nat. Clim. Change 2017 7 220 226 10.1038/nclimate3227 · DOI
  8. [18]Grassi G Reconciling global-model estimates and country reporting of anthropogenic forest CO2 sinks Nat. Clim. Change 2018 8 914 920 10.1038/s41558-018-0283-x · DOI
  9. [22]Myhre, G. et al. Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
  10. [23]UNFCCC. Report of the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement on the Third Part of its First Session, Held in Katowice from 2 to 15 December 2018 Addendum Part two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement, https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma2018_3_add2_new_advance.pdf (United Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2019).
  11. [24]Collins, W. J., Frame, D. J., Fuglestvedt, J. S. & Shine, K. P. Stable climate metrics for emissions of short and long-lived species-combining steps and pulses. Environ. Res. Lett.15, 024018 (2020).
  12. [25]Robiou du Pont Y Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals Nat. Clim. Change 2017 7 38 43 10.1038/nclimate3186 · DOI
  13. [26]Jolliffe IT Cadima J Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2016 374 20150202 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 PMC4792409 26953178 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [27]Doelman JC Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs Glob. Change Biol. 2019 26 1576 1591 10.1111/gcb.14887 31655005 · DOI
  15. [29]Pan X Elzen MD Höhne N Teng F Wang L Exploring fair and ambitious mitigation contributions under the Paris Agreement goals Environ. Sci. Policy 2017 74 49 56 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.020 · DOI
  16. [30]Holz C Kartha S Athanasiou T Fairly sharing 1.5: national fair shares of a 1.5 °C-compliant global mitigation effort Int. Environ. Agreements: Politics, Law Econ. 2018 18 117 134 10.1007/s10784-017-9371-z · DOI
  17. [32]Markandya A Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study Lancet Planet. Health 2018 2 e126 e133 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30029-9 29615227 · DOI
  18. [35]Karakaya E Yılmaz B Alataş S How production-based and consumption-based emissions accounting systems change climate policy analysis: the case of CO2 convergence Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019 26 16682 16694 10.1007/s11356-019-05007-2 30989611 · DOI
  19. [36]Jewell J Cherp A On the political feasibility of climate change mitigation pathways: is it too late to keep warming below 1.5 °C? WIREs Clim. Change 2020 11 e621 10.1002/wcc.621 · DOI
  20. [37]McCollum DL Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals Nat. Energy 2018 3 589 599 10.1038/s41560-018-0179-z · DOI
  21. [40]Robiou du Pont Y Jeffery ML Gütschow J Christoff P Meinshausen M National contributions for decarbonizing the world economy in line with the G7 agreement Environ. Res. Lett. 2016 11 054005 10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Soest, H. L., den Elzen, M. G. J., & van Vuuren, D. P.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-04-09
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
2140-2140
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3142397881
Cited by
568
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 33 · 2017: 1
FWCI
70.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (340201/2017/764007/SER/CLIMA.C1)
  • EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (642147)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
net-zero targets, Paris Agreement, integrated assessment models, non-CO2 emissions, transport emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, Brazil, India, Indonesia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review