Cited by 301Luminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsMolecular Sensors and Ion DetectionPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies

J-aggregates of meso-[2.2]paracyclophanyl-BODIPY dye for NIR-II imaging

Open access
Li, Kang, Duan, Xingchen, Jiang, Zhiyong, Ding, Dan, Chen, Yuncong, Zhang, Guo-Qiang, Liu, Zhipeng·2021·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

J-aggregation is an efficient strategy for the development of fluorescent imaging agents in the second near-infrared window. However, the design of the second near-infrared fluorescent J-aggregates is challenging due to the lack of suitable J-aggregation dyes. Herein, we report meso -[2.2]paracyclophanyl-3,5-bis- N , N -dimethylaminostyrl BODIPY (PCP-BDP2) as an example of BODIPY dye with J-aggregation induced the second near-infrared fluorescence. PCP-BDP2 shows an emission maximum at 1010 nm in the J-aggregation state. Mechanism studies reveal that the steric and conjugation effect of the PCP group on the BODIPY play key roles in the J-aggregation behavior and photophysical properties tuning. Notably, PCP-BDP2 J-aggregates can be utilized for lymph node imaging and fluorescence-guided surgery in the nude mouse, which demonstrates their potential clinical application. This study demonstrates BODIPY dye as an alternate J-aggregation platform for developing the second near-infrared imaging agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-22686-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 301

Authors
Li, K., Duan, X., Jiang, Z., Ding, D., Chen, Y., Zhang, G.-Q., & Liu, Z.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
  • Nankai University (CN)
  • Nanjing University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Yuncong
  • Zhang, Guo-Qiang
  • Liu, Zhipeng
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-04-22
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
2376-2376
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3153227329
Cited by
301
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 17
FWCI
16.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21971115)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Keywords
J-aggregation, BODIPY dyes, NIR-II fluorescence, second near-infrared window, fluorescent imaging agents, lymph node imaging, fluorescence-guided surgery, photophysical properties, nude mice
MeSH terms
Intravital Microscopy, Animals, Boron Compounds, Disease Models, Animal, Fluorescence, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Infrared Rays, Lymphatic System, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Video-Assisted Surgery, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Optical Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review