DeepRank: a deep learning framework for data mining 3D protein-protein interfaces
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) structures of protein complexes provide fundamental information to decipher biological processes at the molecular scale. The vast amount of experimentally and computationally resolved protein-protein interfaces (PPIs) offers the possibility of training deep learning models to aid the predictions of their biological relevance. We present here DeepRank, a general, configurable deep learning framework for data mining PPIs using 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs). DeepRank maps features of PPIs onto 3D grids and trains a user-specified CNN on these 3D grids. DeepRank allows for efficient training of 3D CNNs with data sets containing millions of PPIs and supports both classification and regression. We demonstrate the performance of DeepRank on two distinct challenges: The classification of biological versus crystallographic PPIs, and the ranking of docking models. For both problems DeepRank is competitive with, or outperforms, state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating the versatility of the framework for research in structural biology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 49 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Renaud, N., Geng, C., Georgievska, S., Ambrosetti, F., Ridder, L., Marzella, D. F., Réau, M. F., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., & Xue, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Netherlands eScience Center (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
- Xue, Li C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2021-12-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7068-7068
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8642403
- OpenAlex
- W3216616254
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Netherlands eScience Center (ASDI.2016.043)
- SURF Open Lab “Machine learning enhanced HPC applications” grant
- Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum (Rv819.52706)
- EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (675728, 823830, 777536)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein-protein interfaces, 3D convolutional neural networks, protein complexes, protein docking, structural biology, deep learning framework
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Crystallography, Protein Interaction Mapping, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, Data Mining, Protein Interaction Maps, Molecular Docking Simulation, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review