Cited by 795Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

ProtGPT2 is a deep unsupervised language model for protein design

Open access
Ferruz, Noelia, Schmidt, Steffen, Höcker, Birte·2022·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Protein design aims to build new proteins from scratch thereby holding the potential to tackle many environmental and biomedical problems. Recent progress in the field of natural language processing (NLP) has enabled the implementation of ever-growing language models capable of understanding and generating text with human-like capabilities. Given the many similarities between human languages and protein sequences, the use of NLP models offers itself for predictive tasks in protein research. Motivated by the evident success of generative Transformer-based language models such as the GPT-x series, we developed ProtGPT2, a language model trained on protein space that generates de novo protein sequences that follow the principles of natural ones. In particular, the generated proteins display amino acid propensities which resemble natural proteins. Disorder and secondary structure prediction indicate that 88% of ProtGPT2-generated proteins are globular, in line with natural sequences. Sensitive sequence searches in protein databases show that ProtGPT2 sequences are distantly related to natural ones, and similarity networks further demonstrate that ProtGPT2 is sampling unexplored regions of protein space. AlphaFold prediction of ProtGPT2-sequences yielded well-folded non-idealized structures with embodiments as well as large loops and revealed new topologies not captured in current structure databases. ProtGPT2 has learned to speak the protein language. It has the potential to generate de novo proteins in a high throughput fashion in a matter of seconds. The model is easy-to-use and freely available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-022-32007-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ProtGPT2 aims to generate de novo protein sequences adhering to natural principles, having been specifically trained in the domain of proteins.

    “ProtGPT2 (Ferruz et al. 2022) aims to generate de novo protein sequences adhering to natural principles, having been specifically trained in the domain of proteins.”

    From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Ferruz et al. 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 795

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [7]Vaswani, A. et al. Transformer: attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5999–6009 (2017).
  2. [15]Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Preprint at arXiv:1810.04805 (2018). · arXiv
  3. [32]Holtzman, A., Buys, J., Du, L., Forbes, M. & Choi, Y. The curious case of neural text degeneration. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2540, (2019).
  4. [33]Keskar, N. S., McCann, B., Varshney, L. R., Xiong, C. & Socher, R. CTRL: a conditional transformer language model for controllable generation. Preprint at arxiv (2019).
  5. [34]Madani, A. et al. ProGen: language modeling for protein generation. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2020.03.07.982272 (2020).

Authors
Ferruz, N., Schmidt, S., & Höcker, B.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Girona (ES)
  • University of Bayreuth (DE)
Corresponding author
Ferruz, Noelia
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2022-07-27
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
4348-4348
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288066876
Cited by
795
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 198 · 2025: 250 · 2024: 228 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 14
FWCI
48.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EPub Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
Funders
AGAUR. Beatriu de Pinós Program MSCA Actions.
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
protein design, protein language models, unsupervised learning, amino acid propensities, protein disorder prediction, sequence similarity networks, AlphaFold structure prediction, protein topology
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Amino Acids, Humans, Language, Proteins, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review