Cited by 47Protein Structure and DynamicsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and Function

Protein shape sampled by ion mobility mass spectrometry consistently improves protein structure prediction

Open access
Turzo, SM Bargeen Alam, Seffernick, Justin T., Rolland, Amber D., Donor, Micah T., Heinze, Sten, Prell, James S., Wysocki, Vicki H., Lindert, Steffen·2022·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Ion mobility (IM) mass spectrometry provides structural information about protein shape and size in the form of an orientationally-averaged collision cross-section (CCS IM ). While IM data have been used with various computational methods, they have not yet been utilized to predict monomeric protein structure from sequence. Here, we show that IM data can significantly improve protein structure determination using the modelling suite Rosetta. We develop the Rosetta Projection Approximation using Rough Circular Shapes (PARCS) algorithm that allows for fast and accurate prediction of CCS IM from structure. Following successful testing of the PARCS algorithm, we use an integrative modelling approach to utilize IM data for protein structure prediction. Additionally, we propose a confidence metric that identifies near native models in the absence of a known structure. The results of this study demonstrate the ability of IM data to consistently improve protein structure prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-022-32075-9

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Turzo, S. B. A., Seffernick, J. T., Rolland, A. D., Donor, M. T., Heinze, S., Prell, J. S., Wysocki, V. H., & Lindert, S.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Lindert, Steffen
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2022-07-28
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
4377-4377
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288096022
Cited by
47
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R21 A125804, P41 GM128577)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
ion mobility mass spectrometry, collision cross sections, protein structure prediction, integrative modeling, Rosetta, monomeric protein, confidence measures, protein shape
MeSH terms
Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Algorithms, Proteins, Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review