Unscheduled DNA replication in G1 causes genome instability and damage signatures indicative of replication collisions
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
DNA replicates once per cell cycle. Interfering with the regulation of DNA replication initiation generates genome instability through over-replication and has been linked to early stages of cancer development. Here, we engineer genetic systems in budding yeast to induce unscheduled replication in a G1-like cell cycle state. Unscheduled G1 replication initiates at canonical S-phase origins. We quantifiy the composition of replisomes in G1- and S-phase and identified firing factors, polymerase α, and histone supply as factors that limit replication outside S-phase. G1 replication per se does not trigger cellular checkpoints. Subsequent replication during S-phase, however, results in over-replication and leads to chromosome breaks and chromosome-wide, strand-biased occurrence of RPA-bound single-stranded DNA, indicating head-to-tail replication collisions as a key mechanism generating genome instability upon G1 replication. Low-level, sporadic induction of G1 replication induces an identical response, indicating findings from synthetic systems are applicable to naturally occurring scenarios of unscheduled replication initiation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 129 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Reusswig, K.-U., Bittmann, J., Peritore, M., Courtes, M., Pardo, B., Wierer, M., Mann, M., & Pfander, B.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (DE)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pfander, Boris
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2022-11-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7014-7014
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9674678
- OpenAlex
- W4309287314
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 129
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PF794 5-1, SFB1064)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- G1 phase, genomic instability, DNA polymerase alpha, replication initiation, chromosome breakage, strand bias, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA replication checkpoint
- MeSH terms
- Cell Cycle, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, Humans, S Phase, Genomic Instability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review