Preparing high-concentration individualized carbon nanotubes for industrial separation of multiple single-chirality species
Open accessAbstract
Industrial production of single-chirality carbon nanotubes is critical for their applications in high-speed and low-power nanoelectronic devices, but both their growth and separation have been major challenges. Here, we report a method for industrial separation of single-chirality carbon nanotubes from a variety of raw materials with gel chromatography by increasing the concentration of carbon nanotube solution. The high-concentration individualized carbon nanotube solution is prepared by ultrasonic dispersion followed by centrifugation and ultrasonic redispersion. With this technique, the concentration of the as-prepared individualized carbon nanotubes is increased from about 0.19 mg/mL to approximately 1 mg/mL, and the separation yield of multiple single-chirality species is increased by approximately six times to the milligram scale in one separation run with gel chromatography. When the dispersion technique is applied to an inexpensive hybrid of graphene and carbon nanotubes with a wide diameter range of 0.8–2.0 nm, and the separation yield of single-chirality species is increased by more than an order of magnitude to the sub-milligram scale. Moreover, with present separation technique, the environmental impact and cost of producing single-chirality species are greatly reduced. We anticipate that this method promotes industrial production and practical applications of single-chirality carbon nanotubes in carbon-based integration circuits.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Theory of chromatography. Part 9. The “theoretical plate” concept in column separations
Glueckauf, E. (1955) · Trans. Faraday Soc. · doi:10.1039/tf9555100034 · Cited by 464 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Con-ceptually, a gel column can be considered as being composed of many thin layers of gel 54 .”
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Yang, D., Li, L., Li, X., Xi, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Wei, X., Zhou, W., Wei, F., Xie, S., & Liu, H.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Huaping
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2023-04-29
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2491-2491
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10148823
- OpenAlex
- W4367367719
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51872320, 51472264, 51820105002, 52172060, 11634014)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDBSSW-SYS028, XDB33030100)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0208402, 2020YFA0714700)
- Youth Innovation Promotion Association (XDB33030100)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
- Keywords
- carbon nanotube separation, size exclusion chromatography, ultrasonic dispersion, nanotube purification, nanoelectronic devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review