Genomic screening of 16 UK native bat species through conservationist networks uncovers coronaviruses with zoonotic potential
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
There has been limited characterisation of bat-borne coronaviruses in Europe. Here, we screened for coronaviruses in 48 faecal samples from 16 of the 17 bat species breeding in the UK, collected through a bat rehabilitation and conservationist network. We recovered nine complete genomes, including two novel coronavirus species, across six bat species: four alphacoronaviruses, a MERS-related betacoronavirus, and four closely related sarbecoviruses. We demonstrate that at least one of these sarbecoviruses can bind and use the human ACE2 receptor for infecting human cells, albeit suboptimally. Additionally, the spike proteins of these sarbecoviruses possess an R-A-K-Q motif, which lies only one nucleotide mutation away from a furin cleavage site (FCS) that enhances infectivity in other coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2. However, mutating this motif to an FCS does not enable spike cleavage. Overall, while UK sarbecoviruses would require further molecular adaptations to infect humans, their zoonotic risk warrants closer surveillance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391 · see citing works
Host Range and Emerging and Reemerging Pathogens
Woolhouse, M. E. J., & Gowtage-Sequeria, S. (2005) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1112.050997 · Cited by 1,586 · see citing works
Evolutionary origins of the SARS-CoV-2 sarbecovirus lineage responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic
Boni, M. F., Lemey, P., Jiang, X., Lam, T. T.-Y., Perry, B. W., Castoe, T. A., Rambaut, A., & Robertson, D. L. (2020) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0771-4 · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
Zoonotic host diversity increases in human-dominated ecosystems
Gibb, R., Redding, D. W., Chin, K. Q., Donnelly, C. A., Blackburn, T. M., Newbold, T., & Jones, K. E. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2562-8 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
Wrobel, A. G., Benton, D. J., Xu, P., Roustan, C., Martin, S. R., Rosenthal, P. B., Skehel, J. J., & Gamblin, S. J. (2020) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-020-0468-7 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Spillover and pandemic properties of zoonotic viruses with high host plasticity
Kreuder Johnson, C., Hitchens, P. L., Smiley Evans, T., Goldstein, T., Thomas, K., Clements, A., Joly, D. O., Wolfe, N. D., Daszak, P., Karesh, W. B., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14830 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Tan, C. C. S., Trew, J., Peacock, T. P., Mok, K. Y., Hart, C., Lau, K., Ni, D., Orme, C. D. L., Ransome, E., Pearse, W. D., Coleman, C. M., Bailey, D., Thakur, N., Quantrill, J. L., Sukhova, K., Richard, D., Kahane, L., Woodward, G., Bell, T., Worledge, L., Nunez-Mino, J., Barclay, W., van Dorp, L., Balloux, F., & Savolainen, V.
- Affiliations
- The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- The Pirbright Institute (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Bat Conservation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Savolainen, Vincent
- ORCID
- Tan, Cedric C. S.
- Trew, Jahcub
- Peacock, Thomas P.
- Mok, Kai Yi
- Hart, Charlie
- Lau, Kelvin
- Ni, Dongchun
- Orme, C. David L.
- Ransome, Emma
- Pearse, William D.
- Coleman, Christopher M.
- Bailey, Dalan
- Thakur, Nazia
- Quantrill, Jessica L.
- Sukhova, Ksenia
- Richard, Damien
- Woodward, Guy
- Bell, Thomas
- Worledge, Lisa
- Barclay, Wendy
- van Dorp, Lucy
- Balloux, Francois
- Savolainen, Vincent
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2023-06-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3322-3322
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10300128
- OpenAlex
- W4382343786
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Keywords
- sarbecoviruses, zoonotic potential, alphacoronavirus, spike protein, furin cleavage site, ACE2 binding, viral surveillance, bat conservation
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Animals, Chiroptera, United Kingdom, Humans, Phylogeny, Genomics, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review