Cited by 65Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningCryptography and Data Security

Differentially private knowledge transfer for federated learning

Open access
Qi, Tao, Wu, Fangzhao, Wu, Chuhan, He, Liang, Huang, Yongfeng, Xie, Xing·2023·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Extracting useful knowledge from big data is important for machine learning. When data is privacy-sensitive and cannot be directly collected, federated learning is a promising option that extracts knowledge from decentralized data by learning and exchanging model parameters, rather than raw data. However, model parameters may encode not only non-private knowledge but also private information of local data, thereby transferring knowledge via model parameters is not privacy-secure. Here, we present a knowledge transfer method named PrivateKT, which uses actively selected small public data to transfer high-quality knowledge in federated learning with privacy guarantees. We verify PrivateKT on three different datasets, and results show that PrivateKT can maximally reduce 84% of the performance gap between centralized learning and existing federated learning methods under strict differential privacy restrictions. PrivateKT provides a potential direction to effective and privacy-preserving knowledge transfer in machine intelligent systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-38794-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 58 · Cited by 65

Authors
Qi, T., Wu, F., Wu, C., He, L., Huang, Y., & Xie, X.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Fangzhao
  • Wu, Chuhan
  • Huang, Yongfeng
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-06-24
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
3785-3785
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381855603
Cited by
65
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82090053, U1936216, U1936208)
  • Tsinghua University
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3302104)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
federated learning, differential privacy, knowledge transfer, privacy-preserving machine learning, decentralized data
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Privacy, Knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review