Cited by 23Cellular transport and secretionAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsATP Synthase and ATPases Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure of the peroxisomal Pex1/Pex6 ATPase complex bound to a substrate

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The double-ring AAA+ ATPase Pex1/Pex6 is required for peroxisomal receptor recycling and is essential for peroxisome formation. Pex1/Pex6 mutations cause severe peroxisome associated developmental disorders. Despite its pathophysiological importance, mechanistic details of the heterohexamer are not yet available. Here, we report cryoEM structures of Pex1/Pex6 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae , with an endogenous protein substrate trapped in the central pore of the catalytically active second ring (D2). Pairs of Pex1/Pex6(D2) subdomains engage the substrate via a staircase of pore-1 loops with distinct properties. The first ring (D1) is catalytically inactive but undergoes significant conformational changes resulting in alternate widening and narrowing of its pore. These events are fueled by ATP hydrolysis in the D2 ring and disengagement of a “twin-seam” Pex1/Pex6(D2) heterodimer from the staircase. Mechanical forces are propagated in a unique manner along Pex1/Pex6 interfaces that are not available in homo-oligomeric AAA-ATPases. Our structural analysis reveals the mechanisms of how Pex1 and Pex6 coordinate to achieve substrate translocation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-41640-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 98

  1. Tolbert, N. E. Microbodies-peroxisomes and glyoxysomes. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 22, 45–74 (1971). · DOI
  2. van den Bosch, H., Schutgens, R. B., Wanders, R. J. & Tager, J. M. Biochemistry of peroxisomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 157–197 (1992). · DOI
  3. Imanaka, T. & Shimozawa, N. Peroxisomes: Biogenesis, Function, and Role in Human Disease; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1169-1 (2019). · DOI
  4. Waterham, H. R. & Ebberink, M. S. Genetics and molecular basis of human peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Biochimica et. biophysica acta 1822, 1430–1441 (2012). · DOI
  5. Wanders, R. J. A. & Waterham, H. R. Peroxisomal disorders I: biochemistry and genetics of peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Clin. Genet. 67, 107–133 (2005). · DOI
  6. Honsho, M., Okumoto, K., Tamura, S. & Fujiki, Y. Peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1299, 45–54 (2020). · DOI
  7. Dahabieh, M. S. et al. Peroxisomes and cancer: The role of a metabolic specialist in a disease of aberrant metabolism. Biochimica et. biophysica acta Rev. cancer 1870, 103–121 (2018). · DOI
  8. Fransen, M., Nordgren, M., Wang, B., Apanasets, O. & van Veldhoven, P. P. Aging, age-related diseases and peroxisomes. Sub-Cell. Biochem. 69, 45–65 (2013). · DOI
  9. Cipolla, C. M. & Lodhi, I. J. Peroxisomal dysfunction in age-related diseases. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.: TEM 28, 297–308 (2017). · DOI
  10. McNew, J. A. & Goodman, J. M. An oligomeric protein is imported into peroxisomes in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 127, 1245–1257 (1994). · DOI
  11. Gould, S. J., Keller, G. A., Hosken, N., Wilkinson, J. & Subramani, S. A conserved tripeptide sorts proteins to peroxisomes. J. Cell Biol. 108, 1657–1664 (1989). · DOI
  12. Lill, P. et al. Towards the molecular architecture of the peroxisomal receptor docking complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 33216–33224; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009502117 (2020). · DOI
  13. Rüttermann, M. & Gatsogiannis, C. Good things come to those who bait: the peroxisomal docking complex. Biol. Chem. 0; https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2022-0161 (2022). · DOI
  14. Gao, Y., Skowyra, M. L., Feng, P. & Rapoport, T. A. Protein import into peroxisomes occurs through a nuclear pore-like phase. Science 378, eadf3971 (2022). · DOI
  15. Meinecke, M. et al. The peroxisomal importomer constitutes a large and highly dynamic pore. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 273–277 (2010). · DOI
  16. Dias, A. F. et al. The peroxisomal matrix protein translocon is a large cavity-forming protein assembly into which PEX5 protein enters to release its cargo. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 15287–15300 (2017). · DOI
  17. Skowyra, M. L. & Rapoport, T. A. PEX5 translocation into and out of peroxisomes drives matrix protein import. Molecular cell, 3209–3225.e7; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2022.07.004 (2022). · DOI
  18. Erdmann, R. & Schliebs, W. Peroxisomal matrix protein import: the transient pore model. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 738–742 (2005). · DOI
  19. Platta, H. W. et al. Ubiquitination of the peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p is required for its recycling. J. Cell Biol. 177, 197–204 (2007). · DOI
  20. Feng, P. et al. A peroxisomal ubiquitin ligase complex forms a retrotranslocation channel. Nature 607, 374–380 (2022). · DOI
  21. Sargent, G. et al. PEX2 is the E3 ubiquitin ligase required for pexophagy during starvation. J. Cell Biol. 214, 677–690 (2016). · DOI
  22. Birschmann, I. et al. Pex15p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae provides a molecular basis for recruitment of the AAA peroxin Pex6p to peroxisomal membranes. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 2226–2236 (2003). · DOI
  23. Matsumoto, N., Tamura, S. & Fujiki, Y. The pathogenic peroxin Pex26p recruits the Pex1p-Pex6p AAA ATPase complexes to peroxisomes. Nat. cell Biol. 5, 454–460 (2003). · DOI
  24. Gardner, B. M. et al. The peroxisomal AAA-ATPase Pex1/Pex6 unfolds substrates by processive threading. Nat. Commun. 9, 135 (2018). · DOI
  25. Pedrosa, A. G. et al. Peroxisomal monoubiquitinated PEX5 interacts with the AAA ATPases PEX1 and PEX6 and is unfolded during its dislocation into the cytosol. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 11553–11563 (2018). · DOI
  26. Miyata, N. & Fujiki, Y. Shuttling mechanism of peroxisome targeting signal type 1 receptor Pex5: ATP-independent import and ATP-dependent export. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10822–10832 (2005). · DOI
  27. Francisco, T. et al. A cargo-centered perspective on the PEX5 receptor-mediated peroxisomal protein import pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 29151–29159 (2013). · DOI
  28. Rosenkranz, K. et al. Functional association of the AAA complex and the peroxisomal importomer. FEBS J. 273, 3804–3815 (2006). · DOI
  29. Platta, H. W. et al. Regulation of peroxisomal matrix protein import by ubiquitination. Biochimica et. biophysica acta 1863, 838–849 (2016). · DOI
  30. Schwerter, D. P., Grimm, I., Platta, H. W. & Erdmann, R. ATP-driven processes of peroxisomal matrix protein import. Biol. Chem. 398, 607–624 (2017). · DOI
  31. Erdmann, R. et al. PAS1, a yeast gene required for peroxisome biogenesis, encodes a member of a novel family of putative ATPases. Cell 64, 499–510 (1991). · DOI
  32. Schliebs, W., Girzalsky, W. & Erdmann, R. Peroxisomal protein import and ERAD: variations on a common theme. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 885–890 (2010). · DOI
  33. Yu, H., Kamber, R. A. & Denic, V. The peroxisomal exportomer directly inhibits phosphoactivation of the pexophagy receptor Atg36 to suppress pexophagy in yeast. eLife 11, e74531 (2022). · DOI
  34. Law, K. B. et al. The peroxisomal AAA ATPase complex prevents pexophagy and development of peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Autophagy 13, 868–884 (2017). · DOI
  35. Ciniawsky, S. et al. Molecular snapshots of the Pex1/6 AAA+ complex in action. Nat. Commun. 6, 7331 (2015). · DOI
  36. Meyer, H. & Weihl, C. C. The VCP/p97 system at a glance: connecting cellular function to disease pathogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 127, 3877–3883 (2014).
  37. Blok, N. B. et al. Unique double-ring structure of the peroxisomal Pex1/Pex6 ATPase complex revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E4017–E4025 (2015).
  38. Gardner, B. M., Chowdhury, S., Lander, G. C. & Martin, A. The Pex1/Pex6 complex is a heterohexameric AAA+ motor with alternating and highly coordinated subunits. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 1375–1388 (2015). · DOI
  39. Saffian, D., Grimm, I., Girzalsky, W. & Erdmann, R. ATP-dependent assembly of the heteromeric Pex1p-Pex6p-complex of the peroxisomal matrix protein import machinery. J. Struct. Biol. 179, 126–132 (2012). · DOI
  40. Faber, K. N., Heyman, J. A. & Subramani, S. Two AAA family peroxins, PpPex1p and PpPex6p, interact with each other in an ATP-dependent manner and are associated with different subcellular membranous structures distinct from peroxisomes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 936–943 (1998). · DOI
  41. Schwerter, D., Grimm, I., Girzalsky, W. & Erdmann, R. Receptor recognition by the peroxisomal AAA complex depends on the presence of the ubiquitin moiety and is mediated by Pex1p. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 15458–15470 (2018). · DOI
  42. Debelyy, M. O. et al. Ubp15p, a ubiquitin hydrolase associated with the peroxisomal export machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 28223–28234 (2011). · DOI
  43. Judy, R. M., Sheedy, C. J. & Gardner, B. M. Insights into the Structure and Function of the Pex1/Pex6 AAA-ATPase in Peroxisome Homeostasis. Cells 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11132067 (2022). · DOI
  44. Pan, M. et al. Mechanistic insight into substrate processing and allosteric inhibition of human p97. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 614–625 (2021). · DOI
  45. Cooney, I. et al. Structure of the Cdc48 segregase in the act of unfolding an authentic substrate. Sci. (N. Y., N. Y.) 365, 502–505 (2019). · DOI
  46. La Peña, A. H. et al. Substrate-engaged 26S proteasome structures reveal mechanisms for ATP-hydrolysis-driven translocation. Sci. (N. Y., N. Y.) 362, eaav0725 (2018). · DOI
  47. Twomey, E. C. et al. Substrate processing by the Cdc48 ATPase complex is initiated by ubiquitin unfolding. Sci. (N. Y., N. Y.) 365, eaax1033 (2019). · DOI
  48. Wald, J. et al. Mechanism of AAA+ ATPase-mediated RuvAB-Holliday junction branch migration. Nature 609, 630–639 (2022). · DOI
  49. Lo, Y.-H. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the essential ribosome assembly AAA-ATPase Rix7. Nat. Commun. 10, 513 (2019).
  50. Puchades, C. et al. Structure of the mitochondrial inner membrane AAA+ protease YME1 gives insight into substrate processing. Sci. (N. Y., N. Y.) 358, eaao0464 (2017). · DOI
  51. Weibezahn, J., Schlieker, C., Bukau, B. & Mogk, A. Characterization of a trap mutant of the AAA+ chaperone ClpB. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 32608–32617 (2003). · DOI
  52. Hanson, P. I. & Whiteheart, S. W. AAA+ proteins: have engine, will work. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 519–529 (2005). · DOI
  53. Pedrosa, A. G. et al. The extraction mechanism of monoubiquitinated PEX5 from the peroxisomal membrane. J. Mol. Biol. 435, 167896 (2023). · DOI
  54. Ripstein, Z. A., Huang, R., Augustyniak, R., Kay, L. E. & Rubinstein, J. L. Structure of a AAA+ unfoldase in the process of unfolding substrate. eLife 6; https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25754 (2017). · DOI
  55. Krause, T., Kunau, W. H. & Erdmann, R. Effect of site-directed mutagenesis of conserved lysine residues upon Pas1 protein function in peroxisome biogenesis. Yeast (Chichester, Engl.) 10, 1613–1620 (1994). · DOI
  56. Puchades, C., Sandate, C. R. & Lander, G. C. The molecular principles governing the activity and functional diversity of AAA+ proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 43–58 (2020). · DOI
  57. Gates, S. N. & Martin, A. Stairway to translocation: AAA+ motor structures reveal the mechanisms of ATP-dependent substrate translocation. Protein Sci. 29, 407–419 (2020). · DOI
  58. Wehmer, M. et al. Structural insights into the functional cycle of the ATPase module of the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1305–1310 (2017). · DOI
  59. Wang, L., Myasnikov, A., Pan, X. & Walter, P. Structure of the AAA protein Msp1 reveals mechanism of mislocalized membrane protein extraction. eLife 9, e54031 (2020). · DOI
  60. Li, S. et al. Molecular basis for ATPase-powered substrate translocation by the Lon AAA+ protease. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 101239 (2021). · DOI
  61. Schieferdecker, A. & Wendler, P. Structural mapping of missense mutations in the Pex1/Pex6 complex. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 3756 (2019). · DOI
  62. Geisbrecht, B. V., Collins, C. S., Reuber, B. E. & Gould, S. J. Disruption of a PEX1-PEX6 interaction is the most common cause of the neurologic disorders Zellweger syndrome, neonatal adrenoleukodystrophy, and infantile Refsum disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 8630–8635 (1998). · DOI
  63. Tan, D., Blok, N. B., Rapoport, T. A. & Walz, T. Structures of the double-ring AAA ATPase Pex1-Pex6 involved in peroxisome biogenesis. FEBS J. 283, 986–992 (2016). · DOI
  64. Grimm, I., Saffian, D., Girzalsky, W. & Erdmann, R. Nucleotide-dependent assembly of the peroxisomal receptor export complex. Sci. Rep. 6, 19838 (2016). · DOI
  65. Huang, R., Ripstein, Z. A., Rubinstein, J. L. & Kay, L. E. Cooperative subunit dynamics modulate p97 function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 158–167 (2019). · DOI
  66. Bulfer, S. L., Chou, T.-F. & Arkin, M. R. p97 disease mutations modulate nucleotide-induced conformation to alter protein-protein interactions. ACS Chem. Biol. 11, 2112–2116 (2016). · DOI
  67. Banerjee, S. et al. 2.3 Å resolution cryo-EM structure of human p97 and mechanism of allosteric inhibition. Sci. (N. Y., N. Y.) 351, 871–875 (2016). · DOI
  68. Rao, M. V., Williams, D. R., Cocklin, S. & Loll, P. J. Interaction between the AAA+ ATPase p97 and its cofactor ataxin3 in health and disease: Nucleotide-induced conformational changes regulate cofactor binding. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 18392–18407 (2017). · DOI
  69. Shiozawa, K. et al. Structure of the N-terminal domain of PEX1 AAA-ATPase. Characterization of a putative adaptor-binding domain. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 50060–50068 (2004). · DOI
  70. Shiozawa, K. et al. The common phospholipid-binding activity of the N-terminal domains of PEX1 and VCP/p97. FEBS J. 273, 4959–4971 (2006). · DOI
  71. Huang, R., Ripstein, Z. A., Rubinstein, J. L. & Kay, L. E. Probing cooperativity of N-terminal domain orientations in the p97 molecular machine: synergy between NMR spectroscopy and cryo-EM. Angew. Chem. (Int. ed. Engl.) 59, 22423–22426 (2020). · DOI
  72. Birschmann, I., Rosenkranz, K., Erdmann, R. & Kunau, W.-H. Structural and functional analysis of the interaction of the AAA-peroxins Pex1p and Pex6p. FEBS J. 272, 47–58 (2005). · DOI
  73. Shin, M. et al. Structures of the human LONP1 protease reveal regulatory steps involved in protease activation. Nat. Commun. 12, 3239 (2021).
  74. Coscia, F. & Löwe, J. Cryo-EM structure of the full-length Lon protease from Thermus thermophilus. FEBS Lett. 595, 2691–2700 (2021). · DOI
  75. Agne, B. et al. Pex8p: an intraperoxisomal organizer of the peroxisomal import machinery. Mol. cell 11, 635–646 (2003). · DOI
  76. Peisker, K. et al. Ribosome-associated complex binds to ribosomes in close proximity of Rpl31 at the exit of the polypeptide tunnel in yeast. Mol. Biol. cell 19, 5279–5288 (2008). · DOI
  77. Hughes, C. S. et al. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments. Nat. Protoc. 14, 68–85 (2019). · DOI
  78. Rappsilber, J., Mann, M. & Ishihama, Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1896–1906 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  79. Olsen, J. V. et al. Parts per million mass accuracy on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell. Proteom.: MCP 4, 2010–2021 (2005). · DOI
  80. Stabrin, M. et al. TranSPHIRE: automated and feedback-optimized on-the-fly processing for cryo-EM. Nat. Commun. 11, 5716 (2020). · DOI
  81. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. methods 14, 331–332 (2017). · DOI
  82. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015). · DOI
  83. Wagner, T. & Raunser, S. The evolution of SPHIRE-crYOLO particle picking and its application in automated cryo-EM processing workflows. Commun. Biol. 3, 61 (2020). · DOI
  84. Schöenfeld, F., Stabrin, M., Shaikh, T. R., Wagner, T. & Raunser, S. Accelerated 2D classification with ISAC using GPUs. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 919994 (2022). · DOI
  85. Yang, Z., Fang, J., Chittuluru, J., Asturias, F. J. & Penczek, P. A. Iterative stable alignment and clustering of 2D transmission electron microscope images. Struct. (Lond., Engl.: 1993) 20, 237–247 (2012). · DOI
  86. Moriya, T. et al. High-resolution single particle analysis from electron cryo-microscopy images using SPHIRE. J. Vis. Exp.; https://doi.org/10.3791/55448 (2017). · DOI
  87. Scheres, S. H. W. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  88. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7; https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42166 (2018). · DOI
  89. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D., Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  90. Terwilliger, T. C., Sobolev, O. V., Afonine, P. V., Adams, P. D. & Read, R. J. Density modification of cryo-EM maps. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Struct. Biol. 76, 912–925 (2020). · DOI
  91. Tan, Y. Z. et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. methods 14, 793–796 (2017). · DOI
  92. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci.: a Publ. Protein Soc. 30, 70–82 (2021). · DOI
  93. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  94. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. computational Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004). · DOI
  95. Lopéz-Blanco, J. R. & Chacón, P. iMODFIT: efficient and robust flexible fitting based on vibrational analysis in internal coordinates. J. Struct. Biol. 184, 261–270 (2013). · DOI
  96. Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Struct. Biol. 74, 519–530 (2018). · DOI
  97. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007). · DOI
  98. Laskowski, R. A. PDBsum: summaries and analyses of PDB structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 221–222 (2001). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Rüttermann, M., Koci, M., Lill, P., Geladas, E. D., Kaschani, F., Klink, B. U., Erdmann, R., & Gatsogiannis, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Gatsogiannis, Christos
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-09-23
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
5942-5942
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386980275
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • URN:NBN Resolver for Germany & Switzerland (German National Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster (cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1430,SFB 1430 Project-ID 424228829, FOR 1905 (PerTrans consortium) GA 2519/1-2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › ATP Synthase and ATPases Research
Keywords
AAA+ ATPase, peroxisome biogenesis, heterohexamer, substrate translocation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activities, Proton-Translocating ATPases, Membrane Proteins, Mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Substrate Specificity, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Peroxisomes, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review