A canonical trajectory of executive function maturation from adolescence to adulthood
Open accessAbstract
Theories of human neurobehavioral development suggest executive functions mature from childhood through adolescence, underlying adolescent risk-taking and the emergence of psychopathology. Investigations with relatively small datasets or narrow subsets of measures have identified general executive function development, but the specific maturational timing and independence of potential executive function subcomponents remain unknown. Integrating four independent datasets (N = 10,766; 8–35 years old) with twenty-three measures from seventeen tasks, we provide a precise charting, multi-assessment investigation, and replication of executive function development from adolescence to adulthood. Across assessments and datasets, executive functions follow a canonical non-linear trajectory, with rapid and statistically significant development in late childhood to mid-adolescence (10–15 years old), before stabilizing to adult-levels in late adolescence (18–20 years old). Age effects are well captured by domain-general processes that generate reproducible developmental templates across assessments and datasets. Results provide a canonical trajectory of executive function maturation that demarcates the boundaries of adolescence and can be integrated into future studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These neurobiological changes underlie profound maturation in motivational and cognitive domains across adolescence.
“These neurobiological changes underlie the profound maturation in motivational and cognitive domains across adolescence [30–34]”
From Adolescent nicotine exposure and persistent neurocircuitry changes: unveiling lifelong psychiatric risks (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
The Introduction describes adolescence as a period of cognitive and affective maturation, and the Discussion reports continued development of goal-directed cognition into late adolescence. The cited paper does not establish that neurobiological changes underlie this maturation, nor does it directly document maturation in the motivational domain. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCognitive skills such as planning, future thinking, inhibiting inappropriate behaviour, emotion regulation, decision making, and particular forms of memory continue to improve during adolescence.
“At the same time, cognitive skills such as planning, future thinking, inhibiting inappropriate behaviour, emotion regulation, decision making, and particular forms of memory continue to improve during adolescence (figure 2). 144-149”
From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [144]
The Discussion reports continued development through late adolescence in inhibiting responses, updating information in memory, and planning for future events. The Introduction also identifies planning as an executive function. But the Discussion’s considerations for future work say the study used affectively neutral measures; the copy does not establish the claimed improvement in emotion regulation or decision making. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 241
- Authors
- Tervo-Clemmens, B., Calabro, F. J., Parr, A. C., Fedor, J., Foran, W., & Luna, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2023-10-30
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6922-6922
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10616171
- OpenAlex
- W4388020267
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 96 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 35.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01MH067924)
- American Psychological Foundation (Visionary)
- Staunton Farm Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- executive function, cognitive development, developmental trajectories, adolescence, adulthood, domain-general processes, cognitive aging, neurobehavioral development
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development, Humans, Psychopathology, Adolescent Development, Young Adult, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review