Cited by 55Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Tandem gene duplications contributed to high-level azole resistance in a rapidly expanding Candida tropicalis population

Open access
Fan, Xin, Dai, Rong-Chen, Zhang, Shu, Geng, Yuan-Yuan, Kang, Mei, Guo, Da-Wen, Mei, Ya-Ning, Pan, Yu-Hong +4 more·2023·Nature Communications

Abstract

Invasive diseases caused by the globally distributed commensal yeast Candida tropicalis are associated with mortality rates of greater than 50%. Notable increases of azole resistance have been observed in this species, particularly within Asia-Pacific regions. Here, we carried out a genetic population study on 1571 global C. tropicalis isolates using multilocus sequence typing (MLST). In addition, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis was conducted on 629 of these strains, comprising 448 clinical invasive strains obtained in this study and 181 genomes sourced from public databases. We found that MLST clade 4 is the predominant azole-resistant clone. WGS analyses demonstrated that dramatically increasing rates of azole resistance are associated with a rapid expansion of cluster AZR, a sublineage of clade 4. Cluster AZR isolates exhibited a distinct high-level azole resistance, which was induced by tandem duplications of the ERG11 A395T gene allele. Ty3/gypsy -like retrotransposons were found to be highly enriched in this population. The alarming expansion of C. tropicalis cluster AZR population underscores the urgent need for strategies against growing threats of antifungal resistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-023-43380-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aneuploidy is a common heritable mechanism responsible for the most widely studied form of antifungal heteroresistance.

    “Aneuploidy is a common heritable mechanism responsible for the most widely studied form of antifungal heteroresistance [148,149,150].”

    From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [149]

    The Results report that chromosome 5 aneuploidy was associated with fluconazole resistance in the studied C. tropicalis isolates. But they found aneuploidy in only 2.1% of strains, and the Discussion says chromosome-level aneuploidy-induced azole resistance remained rare in this species. The paper does not establish that aneuploidy is a common heritable mechanism of antifungal heteroresistance or characterize it as the most widely studied form. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 55

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [69]CLSI. M60: Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 2nd Edition (CLSI, 2020).
  2. [70]CLSI. M59: Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing, 3rd Edition (CLSI, 2020).

Authors
Fan, X., Dai, R.-C., Zhang, S., Geng, Y.-Y., Kang, M., Guo, D.-W., Mei, Y.-N., Pan, Y.-H., Sun, Z.-Y., Xu, Y.-C., Gong, J., & Xiao, M.
Affiliations
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • Union Hospital (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Gong, Jie
  • Xiao, Meng
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2023-12-15
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
8369-8369
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389781763
Cited by
55
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12
FWCI
11.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81802042)
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
  • Peking Union Medical College
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2303002)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida tropicalis, azole resistance, tandem gene duplication, ERG11, Ty3/gypsy retrotransposons, antifungal resistance, invasive candidiasis, population genomics, clinical isolates, drug resistance evolution
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Azoles, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Gene Duplication, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Candida tropicalis, Multilocus Sequence Typing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review