Cited by 14DNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

TopBP1 utilises a bipartite GINS binding mode to support genome replication

Open access
Day, Matthew, Tetik, Bilal, Parlak, Milena, Almeida-Hernández, Yasser, Räschle, Markus, Kaschani, Farnusch, Siegert, Heike, Marko, Anika +6 more·2024·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Activation of the replicative Mcm2-7 helicase by loading GINS and Cdc45 is crucial for replication origin firing, and as such for faithful genetic inheritance. Our biochemical and structural studies demonstrate that the helicase activator GINS interacts with TopBP1 through two separate binding surfaces, the first involving a stretch of highly conserved amino acids in the TopBP1-GINI region, the second a surface on TopBP1-BRCT4. The two surfaces bind to opposite ends of the A domain of the GINS subunit Psf1. Mutation analysis reveals that either surface is individually able to support TopBP1-GINS interaction, albeit with reduced affinity. Consistently, either surface is sufficient for replication origin firing in Xenopus egg extracts and becomes essential in the absence of the other. The TopBP1-GINS interaction appears sterically incompatible with simultaneous binding of DNA polymerase epsilon (Polε) to GINS when bound to Mcm2-7-Cdc45, although TopBP1-BRCT4 and the Polε subunit PolE2 show only partial competitivity in binding to Psf1. Our TopBP1-GINS model improves the understanding of the recently characterised metazoan pre-loading complex. It further predicts the coordination of three molecular origin firing processes, DNA polymerase epsilon arrival, TopBP1 ejection and GINS integration into Mcm2-7-Cdc45.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-45946-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Day, M., Tetik, B., Parlak, M., Almeida-Hernández, Y., Räschle, M., Kaschani, F., Siegert, H., Marko, A., Sanchez-Garcia, E., Kaiser, M., Barker, I. A., Pearl, L. H., Oliver, A. W., & Boos, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • University of Kaiserslautern (DE)
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Day, Matthew
  • Pearl, Laurence H.
  • Oliver, Antony W.
  • Boos, Dominik
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-02-27
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1797-1797
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392188484
Cited by
14
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1430; 424228829, RTG1739, FOR2800, INST 20876/322-1 FUGG, EXC-390677874-RESOLV, INST - 436586093)
  • Cancer Research UK (C302/A14532, C302/A24386)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
TopBP1, GINS, MCM2-7 helicase, Cdc45, DNA polymerase epsilon, pre-replication complex, Xenopus egg extracts
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA Polymerase II, DNA Replication, DNA-Binding Proteins, Virus Replication, Cell Cycle Proteins, Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review