Hybrid adaptation is hampered by Haldane’s sieve
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Hybrids between species exhibit plastic genomic architectures that could foster or slow down their adaptation. When challenged to evolve in an environment containing a UV mimetic drug, yeast hybrids have reduced adaptation rates compared to parents. We find that hybrids and their parents converge onto similar molecular mechanisms of adaptation by mutations in pleiotropic transcription factors, but at a different pace. After 100 generations, mutations in these genes tend to be homozygous in the parents but heterozygous in the hybrids. We hypothesize that a lower rate of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in hybrids could limit fitness gain. Using genome editing, we first demonstrate that mutations display incomplete dominance, requiring homozygosity to show full impact and to entirely circumvent Haldane’s sieve, which favors the fixation of dominant mutations. Second, tracking mutations in earlier generations confirmed a different rate of LOH in hybrids. Together, these findings show that Haldane’s sieve slows down adaptation in hybrids, revealing an intrinsic constraint of hybrid genomic architecture that can limit the role of hybridization in adaptive evolution. Hybrids have complex genomes that influence their adaptive potential. This study reveals that yeast hybrids adapt slower than their parental species in a new environment, primarily due to a reduced rate of loss of heterozygosity in key genes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 166 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Bautista, C., Gagnon-Arsenault, I., Utrobina, M., Fijarczyk, A., Bendixsen, D. P., Stelkens, R., & Landry, C. R.
- Affiliations
- PROTEO (CA)
- National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (UA)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Bautista, Carla
- Landry, Christian R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2024-11-28
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10319-10319
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11604976
- OpenAlex
- W4404792126
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 166
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Génome Québec
- Fundación Bancaria Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona (ID 100010434, 100010434)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (04844, RGPIN 2020, rgpin-2020-04844)
- Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies (274987)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, hybrid adaptation, incomplete dominance, adaptive evolution, heterozygosity, genome editing
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Adaptation, Physiological, Homozygote, Hybridization, Genetic, Mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription Factors, Genome, Fungal, Loss of Heterozygosity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review