Native Fold Delay and its implications for co-translational chaperone binding and protein aggregation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
ABSTRACT Because of vectorial protein production, residues that interact in the native protein structure but are distantly separated in the primary sequence are unavailable simultaneously. Instead, there is a temporal delay during which the N-terminal interaction partner is vulnerable to off-pathway, non-native interactions. In this analysis, we introduce “FoldDelay” (FD), a metric that integrates the topological pattern of atomic interactions of the native structure with translation kinetics to quantify such time delays. The FD metric reveals that many proteins, particularly at eukaryotic translation rates, exhibit residues with FDs in the range of tens of seconds. These residues, predominantly in well-structured, buried regions, often coincide with predicted aggregation-prone regions. We show a correlation between FD and co-translational engagement by the yeast Hsp70 chaperone Ssb, suggesting that fold-delayed regions have a propensity to misfold. In support of this, we show that proteins with high FDs are more frequently co-translationally ubiquitinated and prone to aggregate upon Ssb deletion. Finally, we find that FD cannot be adequately reduced through codon optimization, highlighting the importance of co-translational chaperones to shield these vulnerable regions. This work offers insights into co-translational proteostasis and the delicate balance between efficient folding and potential misfolding and aggregation during translation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Rosenzweig, R., Nillegoda, N. B., Mayer, M. P., & Bukau, B. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0133-3 · Cited by 1,285 · see citing works
AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Ruff, K. M., & Pappu, R. V. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167208 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Cotranslational protein assembly imposes evolutionary constraints on homomeric proteins
Natan, E., Endoh, T., Haim-Vilmovsky, L., Flock, T., Chalancon, G., Hopper, J. T. S., Kintses, B., Horvath, P., Daruka, L., Fekete, G., et al. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-018-0029-5 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Duran-Romaña, R., Houben, B., Migens, P. F., Zhang, Y., Rousseau, F., & Schymkowitz, J.
- Affiliations
- VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schymkowitz, Joost
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2025-02-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1673-1673
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11830000
- OpenAlex
- W4407595534
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (C0401)
- KU Leuven (PDMT2/24/084)
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G0A6724N, 12S3722N)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- co-translational folding, protein aggregation, sugar-sweetened beverages, Hsp70 chaperones, ubiquitination, protein topology, translation kinetics, protein misfolding, yeast
- MeSH terms
- DNA-Binding Proteins, Kinetics, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Protein Biosynthesis, Protein Folding, Molecular Chaperones, HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Ubiquitination, Protein Aggregates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review