Cited by 34Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Macroscopic bubble generation promoted by nanobubble seeds as a traceless anti-fluctuation strategy for water splitting

Open access
Yang, Sheng, Yuan, Jing, Xie, Pengpeng, Li, Bo, Li, Mengxuan, Zhou, Daojin, Luo, Liang, Sun, Xiaoming·2025·Nature Communications

Abstract

To adapt fluctuating renewable energy for water splitting is challenging, since the growth of electrochemically generated nanobubbles at early stage requires high supersaturation during the repeated start-stop cycles, which can accelerate the deactivation of electrodes and cause extra energy consumption. Herein, we propose a “bubble seeding” strategy by introducing nanobubbles (NBs, ~200 nm in diameter) into electrolyte to promote the generation of macroscopic bubbles. The precursive nanobubbles can act as the beforehand nuclei with a certain supersaturation, lower the supersaturation barrier for further growth, and result in reduced overpotential as high as 130 mV for oxygen evolution reaction. The enhancement depends on nanobubble coverage and size, with higher coverage and larger sizes favoring macrobubble growth. The nanobubbles with inert gas species (e.g. N2 for oxygen evolution reaction) can also work as the seeds, while the interfering or consumable gas species (e.g. O2 for hydrogen evolution reaction) would hinder the generation of macroscopic bubbles and enlarge the overpotential. The water splitting device working at presence of nanobubbles exhibits stable operation voltage during repeated start-stop cycles in contrast to traditional electrolyte without NBs, indicating great potential of such traceless nanobubble additive strategy for stabilizing gas evolution applications. To adapt fluctuating renewable energy for water splitting is challenging. Here, the authors provide a “bubble seeding” strategy by introducing electrolyte with nanobubbles to promote the generation of macrobubbles, achieving more stable operation using intermittent energy supply for water splitting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-61131-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For electrodes with poor hydrophilicity, adhesion of air bubbles to the surface reduces effective active area, which increases activation overpotential.

    “It can be observed that for electrodes with poor hydrophilicity, the adhesion of air bubbles to the surface leads to a reduction in the Aeff, which in turn results in an increase in ηact.”

    From Advances in Surface/Interface Engineering of Under-Water Superaerophobic Electrodes for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction by Manipulating of Bubbles (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction (page not available) says attached macrobubbles can reduce the electrocatalytic surface area, supporting the claim about lost effective area. It attributes the resulting loss to additional transport overpotential, not activation overpotential, and does not limit the statement to poorly hydrophilic electrodes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 34

Authors
Yang, S., Yuan, J., Xie, P., Li, B., Li, M., Zhou, D., Luo, L., & Sun, X.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Luo, Liang
  • Sun, Xiaoming
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-07-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
5732-5732
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411886962
Cited by
34
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 6
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22379005)
  • National Key Research and Development Projec
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
water splitting, oxygen evolution reaction, hydrogen evolution reaction, bubble nucleation, supersaturation, start-stop cycling, variable renewable energy, electrode stability, electrolyte additives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review