Cited by 12Membrane Separation and Gas TransportCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesGraphene research and applications

Gated CO2 permeation across dynamic graphene pores

Open access
Bondaz, Luc, Ronghe, Anshaj, Ganapathy Ayappa, K., Agrawal, Kumar Varoon·2025·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Oxidation of graphene has been successfully used to incorporate semiquinone (C=O)-functionalized Å-scale pores, yielding attractive carbon capture performance. However, the true potential of such pores has remained unclear due to a lack of dedicated mechanistic studies. Herein, using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we show that C=O displays a remarkable molecular-interaction-dependent dynamic motion, leading to a distribution in PLD comparable to the size differences between CO2, O2, and N2. Dynamic open and closed pore states are observed in small pores, making impermeable pores CO2-permeable. The strong molecular interaction eliminates effusive transport, resulting in selective gating of CO2 from O2 and N2, even from large PLD pores expected to be nonselective. Finally, transition-state-theory calculations validated against MD simulations reveal the immense potential of porous graphene for carbon capture beyond the state-of-the-art membranes. These insights will inspire improved graphene membrane design, pushing the carbon capture frontier.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-61518-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 12

Authors
Bondaz, L., Ronghe, A., Ganapathy Ayappa, K., & Agrawal, K. V.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Corresponding author
Agrawal, Kumar Varoon
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-07-07
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
6252-6252
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412072574
Cited by
12
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
EPFL
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
Keywords
graphene oxidation, CO2 permeation, gas transport mechanisms, transition state theory, CO2 capture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review