Cited by 5Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsDNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Centromere protection requires strict mitotic inactivation of the Bloom syndrome helicase complex

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The BTRR ( B LM/ T OP3A/ R MI1/ R MI2) complex resolves DNA replication and recombination intermediates to maintain genome stability. Alongside PICH, they target mitotic DNA intertwinements, known as ultrafine DNA bridges, facilitating chromosome segregation. Both BLM and PICH undergo transient mitotic hyper-phosphorylation, but the biological significance of this remains elusive. Here, we uncover that during early mitosis, CDK1 and PLK1 constrain BTRR complex activities at centromeres. CDK1 destabilises the complex, limiting its binding to PICH at specialised chromatin underneath kinetochores. Inactivating the BLM-TOP3A interaction compromises the UFB-binding complex functions and prevents centromere destruction. Different phosphorylation on BLM affects the TRR subcomplex interaction and the mitotic activity, particularly phosphorylation at Ser144 and multiple PLK1-target sites suppresses illegitimate centromeric DNA unwinding. However, unleashing such activity after sister-chromatid cohesion inactivation facilitates the separation of entangled chromosomes. Here, we show a centromere protection pathway in human mitotic cells, heavily reliant on a tight spatiotemporal control of the BTRR complex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-62966-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Chan, K. L., North, P. S. & Hickson, I. D. BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges. EMBO J. 26, 3397–3409 (2007). · DOI
  2. Baumann, C., Korner, R., Hofmann, K. & Nigg, E. A. PICH, a centromere-associated SNF2 family ATPase, is regulated by Plk1 and required for the spindle checkpoint. Cell 128, 101–114 (2007). · DOI
  3. Chan, K. L., Palmai-Pallag, T., Ying, S. & Hickson, I. D. Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 753–760 (2009). · DOI
  4. Chan, Y. W., Fugger, K. & West, S. C. Unresolved recombination intermediates lead to ultra-fine anaphase bridges, chromosome breaks and aberrations. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 92–103 (2018). · DOI
  5. Tiwari, A., Addis Jones, O. & Chan, K. L. 53BP1 can limit sister-chromatid rupture and rearrangements driven by a distinct ultrafine DNA bridging-breakage process. Nat. Commun. 9, 677 (2018). · DOI
  6. Fernandez-Casanas, M. & Chan, K. L. The unresolved problem of DNA Bridging. Genes 9, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9120623 (2018). · DOI
  7. Leibowitz, M. L., Zhang, C. Z. & Pellman, D. Chromothripsis: a new mechanism for rapid karyotype evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 49, 183–211 (2015). · DOI
  8. Sarlos, K. et al. Reconstitution of anaphase DNA bridge recognition and disjunction. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 868–876 (2018). · DOI
  9. Hengeveld, R. C. et al. Rif1 is required for resolution of ultrafine dna bridges in anaphase to ensure genomic stability. Dev. Cell 34, 466–474 (2015). · DOI
  10. Wu, L. & Hickson, I. D. The Bloom’s syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426, 870–874 (2003). · DOI
  11. Bussen, W., Raynard, S., Busygina, V., Singh, A. K. & Sung, P. Holliday junction processing activity of the BLM-Topo IIIalpha-BLAP75 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 31484–31492 (2007). · DOI
  12. Wu, L. et al. BLAP75/RMI1 promotes the BLM-dependent dissolution of homologous recombination intermediates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4068–4073 (2006). · DOI
  13. Ellis, N. A. & German, J. Molecular genetics of Bloom’s syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 1457–1463 (1996). · DOI
  14. Martin, C. A. et al. Mutations in TOP3A cause a bloom syndrome-like disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 103, 221–231 (2018). · DOI
  15. Bayart, E. et al. The Bloom syndrome helicase is a substrate of the mitotic Cdc2 kinase. Cell Cycle 5, 1681–1686 (2006). · DOI
  16. Leng, M. et al. MPS1-dependent mitotic BLM phosphorylation is important for chromosome stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11485–11490 (2006). · DOI
  17. Leng, M., Besusso, D., Jung, S. Y., Wang, Y. & Qin, J. Targeting Plk1 to chromosome arms and regulating chromosome compaction by the PICH ATPase. Cell Cycle 7, 1480–1489 (2008). · DOI
  18. Balbo Pogliano, C. et al. The CDK1-TOPBP1-PLK1 axis regulates the Bloom’s syndrome helicase BLM to suppress crossover recombination in somatic cells. Sci. Adv. 8, eabk0221 (2022). · DOI
  19. Pradhan, A., Singh, T. R., Ali, A. M., Wahengbam, K. & Meetei, A. R. Monopolar spindle 1 (MPS1) protein-dependent phosphorylation of RecQ-mediated genome instability protein 2 (RMI2) at serine 112 is essential for BLM-Topo III alpha-RMI1-RMI2 (BTR) protein complex function upon spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) activation during mitosis. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 33500–33508 (2013). · DOI
  20. Addis Jones, O., Tiwari, A., Olukoga, T., Herbert, A. & Chan, K. L. PLK1 facilitates chromosome biorientation by suppressing centromere disintegration driven by BLM-mediated unwinding and spindle pulling. Nat. Commun. 10, 2861 (2019). · DOI
  21. Dutertre, S. et al. Dephosphorylation and subcellular compartment change of the mitotic Bloom’s syndrome DNA helicase in response to ionizing radiation. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 6280–6286 (2002). · DOI
  22. Kharat, S. S. et al. Mitotic phosphorylation of Bloom helicase at Thr182 is required for its proteasomal degradation and maintenance of chromosomal stability. Oncogene 35, 1025–1038 (2016). · DOI
  23. Kong, N., Liu, Z. & Chan, Y. W. RIF1 suppresses the formation of single-stranded ultrafine anaphase bridges via protein phosphatase 1. Cell Rep. 42, 112032 (2023). · DOI
  24. Lera, R. F. et al. Plk1 protects kinetochore-centromere architecture against microtubule pulling forces. EMBO Rep. 20, e48711 (2019). · DOI
  25. Steegmaier, M. et al. BI 2536, a potent and selective inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1, inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Curr. Biol. 17, 316–322 (2007). · DOI
  26. Hu, P. et al. Evidence for BLM and topoisomerase IIIalpha interaction in genomic stability. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 1287–1298 (2001). · DOI
  27. Shorrocks, A. K. et al. The Bloom syndrome complex senses RPA-coated single-stranded DNA to restart stalled replication forks. Nat. Commun. 12, 585 (2021). · DOI
  28. Hodson, C. et al. Mechanism of Bloom syndrome complex assembly required for double Holliday junction dissolution and genome stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109093119 (2022). · DOI
  29. Blackford, A. N. et al. TopBP1 interacts with BLM to maintain genome stability but is dispensable for preventing BLM degradation. Mol. Cell 57, 1133–1141 (2015). · DOI
  30. Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Yoda, K., Kitagawa, K., Masumoto, H., Muro, Y. & Okazaki, T. A human centromere protein, CENP-B, has a DNA binding domain containing four potential alpha helices at the NH2 terminus, which is separable from dimerizing activity. J. Cell Biol. 119, 1413–1427 (1992). · DOI
  32. Loe, T. K. et al. Telomere length heterogeneity in ALT cells is maintained by PML-dependent localization of the BTR complex to telomeres. Genes Dev. 34, 650–662 (2020). · DOI
  33. Sarthy, J., Bae, N. S., Scrafford, J. & Baumann, P. Human RAP1 inhibits non-homologous end joining at telomeres. EMBO J. 28, 3390–3399 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Singh, T. R. et al. BLAP18/RMI2, a novel OB-fold-containing protein, is an essential component of the Bloom helicase-double Holliday junction dissolvasome. Genes Dev. 22, 2856–2868 (2008). · DOI
  35. Vassilev, L. T. et al. Selective small-molecule inhibitor reveals critical mitotic functions of human CDK1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10660–10665 (2006). · DOI
  36. Choi, M. et al. TC Mps1 12, a novel Mps1 inhibitor, suppresses the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via the accumulation of chromosomal instability. Br. J. Pharm. 174, 1810–1825 (2017). · DOI
  37. Potapova, T. A. et al. The reversibility of mitotic exit in vertebrate cells. Nature 440, 954–958 (2006). · DOI
  38. Olsen, J. V. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci Signal. 3, ra3, https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2000475 (2010). · DOI
  39. Santamaria, A. et al. Use of the novel Plk1 inhibitor ZK-thiazolidinone to elucidate functions of Plk1 in early and late stages of mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 4024–4036 (2007). · DOI
  40. Santamaria, A. et al. The Plk1-dependent phosphoproteome of the early mitotic spindle. Mol. Cell Proteom. 10, M110 004457 (2011). · DOI
  41. Sharma, K. et al. Ultradeep human phosphoproteome reveals a distinct regulatory nature of Tyr and Ser/Thr-based signaling. Cell Rep. 8, 1583–1594 (2014). · DOI
  42. Dephoure, N. et al. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10762–10767 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Malik, R. et al. Quantitative analysis of the human spindle phosphoproteome at distinct mitotic stages. J. Proteome Res. 8, 4553–4563 (2009). · DOI
  44. Hegemann, B. et al. Systematic phosphorylation analysis of human mitotic protein complexes. Sci. Signal. 4, rs12, https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001993 (2011). · DOI
  45. Grosstessner-Hain, K. et al. Quantitative phospho-proteomics to investigate the polo-like kinase 1-dependent phospho-proteome. Mol. Cell Proteom. 10, M111 008540 (2011). · DOI
  46. Kettenbach, A. N. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics identifies substrates and functional modules of Aurora and Polo-like kinase activities in mitotic cells. Sci. Signal. 4, rs5, https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001497 (2011). · DOI
  47. Sun, L. et al. Structural insight into BLM recognition by TopBP1. Structure 25, 1582–1588 e1583 (2017). · DOI
  48. Shi, J. et al. A helical bundle in the N-terminal domain of the BLM helicase mediates dimer and potentially hexamer formation. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 5909–5920 (2017). · DOI
  49. Kuijt, T. E. F. et al. A Biosensor for the Mitotic Kinase MPS1 Reveals Spatiotemporal Activity Dynamics and Regulation. Curr. Biol. 30, 3862–3870 e3866 (2020). · DOI
  50. Hiraga, S. I. et al. Human RIF1 and protein phosphatase 1 stimulate DNA replication origin licensing but suppress origin activation. EMBO Rep. 18, 403–419 (2017). · DOI
  51. Mitsuhashi, S. et al. Tautomycetin is a novel and specific inhibitor of serine/threonine protein phosphatase type 1, PP1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 287, 328–331 (2001). · DOI
  52. van Vugt, M. A. et al. A mitotic phosphorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000287 (2010). · DOI
  53. Yata, K. et al. Plk1 and CK2 act in concert to regulate Rad51 during DNA double strand break repair. Mol. Cell 45, 371–383 (2012). · DOI
  54. Giunta, S., Belotserkovskaya, R. & Jackson, S. P. DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 190, 197–207 (2010). · DOI
  55. Ayoub, N. et al. The carboxyl terminus of Brca2 links the disassembly of Rad51 complexes to mitotic entry. Curr. Biol. 19, 1075–1085 (2009). · DOI
  56. Giunta, S. & Jackson, S. P. Give me a break, but not in mitosis: the mitotic DNA damage response marks DNA double-strand breaks with early signaling events. Cell Cycle 10, 1215–1221 (2011). · DOI
  57. Lee, D. H. et al. Dephosphorylation enables the recruitment of 53BP1 to double-strand DNA breaks. Mol. Cell 54, 512–525 (2014). · DOI
  58. Benada, J., Burdova, K., Lidak, T., von Morgen, P. & Macurek, L. Polo-like kinase 1 inhibits DNA damage response during mitosis. Cell Cycle 14, 219–231 (2015). · DOI
  59. Johnson, F. B. et al. Association of the Bloom syndrome protein with topoisomerase IIIalpha in somatic and meiotic cells. Cancer Res. 60, 1162–1167 (2000).
  60. Xu, C. et al. Accumulation and phosphorylation of RecQ-mediated genome instability protein 1 (RMI1) at serine 284 and Serine 292 during mitosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 26395–26405 (2015). · DOI
  61. Arnaud, L., Pines, J. & Nigg, E. A. GFP tagging reveals human Polo-like kinase 1 at the kinetochore/centromere region of mitotic chromosomes. Chromosoma 107, 424–429 (1998). · DOI
  62. Adams, R. R. et al. Human INCENP colocalizes with the Aurora-B/AIRK2 kinase on chromosomes and is overexpressed in tumour cells. Chromosoma 110, 65–74 (2001). · DOI
  63. Stucke, V. M., Sillje, H. H., Arnaud, L. & Nigg, E. A. Human Mps1 kinase is required for the spindle assembly checkpoint but not for centrosome duplication. EMBO J. 21, 1723–1732 (2002). · DOI
  64. Hudson, D. F. et al. Loss of RMI2 increases genome instability and causes a bloom-like syndrome. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006483 (2016). · DOI
  65. Kowarz, E., Loscher, D. & Marschalek, R. Optimized sleeping beauty transposons rapidly generate stable transgenic cell lines. Biotechnol. J. 10, 647–653 (2015). · DOI
  66. Martin, P. R. et al. The mitotic CIP2A-TOPBP1 axis facilitates mitotic pathway choice between MiDAS and MMEJ. bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.12.621593 (2024). · DOI
  67. Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D543–D553 (2025). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Fernández-Casañas, M., Karanika, E., Aliyaskarova, U., Olukoga, T., Herbert, A. D., Oliver, A. W., Day, M., Crncec, A., & Chan, K.-L.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Chan, Kok-Lung
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-08-22
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
7832-7832
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413421358
Cited by
5
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (225348/Z/22/Z, 104178/Z/14/A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
Bloom syndrome helicase, BLM, TOP3A, RMI1, RMI2, PICH, CDK1, PLK1, sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome segregation, genome stability
MeSH terms
Polo-Like Kinase 1, Centromere, DNA-Binding Proteins, HeLa Cells, Humans, Mitosis, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphorylation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, CDC2 Protein Kinase, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Kinetochores, Cell Cycle Proteins, Chromosome Segregation, Multiprotein Complexes, RecQ Helicases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review